1976
DOI: 10.1139/m76-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved techniques for the preparation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides

Abstract: Liopolysaccharides were prepared from six organisms by the use of two cell-disruption procedures before conventional phenol-water extraction. Disruption of cells by grinding with glass beads or by digestion with hen egg white lysozyme before phenol extraction facilitated rapid purification and greater yields of lipopolysaccharide. Pretreatment of cells with lysozyme in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was the most efficient method in terms of lipopolysaccharide yield and ease of preparation. Inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
181
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery of solids from RNase ONE-treated cell lysates (10 YO) and untreated cell lysates (15 %) was similar to previously reported values (Johnson & Perry, 1976;Westphal & Jann, 1965;Romanowska & Mulczyk, 1968), but the recovery of the LOS from the gel filtration step on the Superose 6 column (80%) was slightly higher than that obtained with conventional gel filtration (Rodahl & Meningococcal lipo-oligosaccharide purification Maeland, 1984). The final yield of LOS (0.5-0-6%) was similar to, and levels of RNA contamination less than, those obtained by others (Wu e t al., 1987;G u & Tsai, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recovery of solids from RNase ONE-treated cell lysates (10 YO) and untreated cell lysates (15 %) was similar to previously reported values (Johnson & Perry, 1976;Westphal & Jann, 1965;Romanowska & Mulczyk, 1968), but the recovery of the LOS from the gel filtration step on the Superose 6 column (80%) was slightly higher than that obtained with conventional gel filtration (Rodahl & Meningococcal lipo-oligosaccharide purification Maeland, 1984). The final yield of LOS (0.5-0-6%) was similar to, and levels of RNA contamination less than, those obtained by others (Wu e t al., 1987;G u & Tsai, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Hot phenol extraction of whole cells (Westphal & Jann, 1965) or cell lysates (Johnson & Perry, 1976) can be used to prepare samples of the LOS of a number of Neisseria species. However, whilst these preparations are adequate for electrophoretic analyses, they contain RNA as their main component and require further purification before use in molecular and immunological studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live S. typhimurium C5 was prepared by diluting (1/10) an overnight culture in fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and incubating for a further 2 h, then washing the bacteria in LB broth and diluting as required in DMEM. S. typhimurium C5 LPS was extracted by hot phenol water purification (27) and dissolved in distilled water at 1 mg/ml, then sonicated and diluted in DMEM.…”
Section: Bacteria and Preparation Of Lpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPS was extracted from campylobacters by the method of Johnson and Perry (1976). Briefly, the bacteria were scraped from the surface of blood-agar plates with a loop and suspended in phenol 1% in pyrogen-free water.…”
Section: Lipopolysaccharides (Lps)mentioning
confidence: 99%