Improved tools and strategies for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: A research-to-policy forum

Abstract

BackgroundResearch has been conducted on interventions to control dengue transmission and respond to outbreaks. A summary of the available evidence will help inform disease control policy decisions and research directions, both for dengue and, more broadly, for all Aedes-borne arboviral diseases.MethodA research-to-policy forum was convened by TDR, the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, with researchers and representatives from ministries of health, in order to review research findings and discuss their implications for policy and research.ResultsThe participants reviewed findings of research supported by TDR and others.Surveillance and early outbreak warning. Systematic reviews and country studies identify the critical characteristics that an alert system should have to document trends reliably and trigger timely responses (i.e., early enough to prevent the epidemic spread of the virus) to dengue outbreaks. A range of variables that, according to the literature, either indicate risk of forthcoming dengue transmission or predict dengue outbreaks were tested and some of them could be successfully applied in an Early Warning and Response System (EWARS).Entomological surveillance and vector management. A summary of the published literature shows that controlling Aedes vectors requires complex interventions and points to the need for more rigorous, standardised study designs, with disease reduction as the primary outcome to be measured. House screening and targeted vector interventions are promising vector management approaches. Sampling vector populations, both for surveillance purposes and evaluation of control activities, is usually conducted in an unsystematic way, limiting the potentials of entomological surveillance for outbreak prediction.Combining outbreak alert and improved approaches of vector management will help to overcome the present uncertainties about major risk groups or areas where outbreak response should be initiated and where resources for vector management should be allocated during the interepidemic period.ConclusionsThe Forum concluded that the evidence collected can inform policy decisions, but also that important research gaps have yet to be filled.

Ingested insecticide to control Aedes aegypti: developing a novel dried attractive toxic sugar bait device for intra-domiciliary control

“…aegypti serving as the principal vector in many South American countries, including Ecuador [2]. Due to the lack of commercially available vaccines for most human arboviral diseases, prevention efforts focus on vector surveillance and control methods [3].…”

Eliminating Dengue Fever should be Easy Compared to Malaria – In a Malaysian Perspective

“…Olliaro P, et al (2018) beside writing in a same manner on critical-characteristic that an alert system should have to document trend reliably and trigger timely response (i.e., early enough to prevent the epidemic spread of the virus) to dengue outbreaks addressing a range of variable(s) that either indicate risk of forthcoming dengue transmission or predict dengue outbreaks that could be successfully applied to Early Warning and Response System (EWARS), had also written that summary of published literature show that controlling Aedes vectors require complex-intervention and point to the need in standardized energetic-effort with disease-reduction as the measured primary outcome. Sampling vector populations, both here in a surveillance-aim and evaluation of controlactivity, many a such researcher claim is usually seen carried out in an unsystematic way, limiting the potential(s) of entomological-surveillance toward outbreak prediction [24].…”

Revenue, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Implementation Regarding the Dengue Fever Prevention Program in Medan, Indonesia

“…A literature review conducted by Olliaro et al (2018) found that controlling the Aedes vector requires complex intervention. A community-based approach and the public sector will empower risk populations, reduce intervention costs, build sustainability, and increase the impact of vector control interventions.…”