2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Tropical Forest Management for Carbon Retention

Abstract: Using reduced-impact timber-harvesting practices in legally logged tropical forests would reduce global carbon emissions by 0.16 Gt/year at a modest cost and with little risk of "leakage" (increased carbon emissions elsewhere).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
0
22

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
118
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…They also responded differently to the level of microhabitat disturbance found within logged forest, with native species appearing to be associated with less intensive disturbance whilst the invasive R. rattus, which is known to pose a threat to native species through competition for resources and direct interference, demonstrated a preference for more degraded sites. We suggest that reduced-impact logging policies that minimize forest disturbance, as well as the rehabilitation of highly degraded areas that have already been logged, will provide added benefits in terms of invasion resistance, in addition to well-documented direct benefits in terms of carbon and biodiversity (Putz et al 2008b). Without these, we risk compromising the biodiversity value of logged secondary forests by facilitating the spread of invasive species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They also responded differently to the level of microhabitat disturbance found within logged forest, with native species appearing to be associated with less intensive disturbance whilst the invasive R. rattus, which is known to pose a threat to native species through competition for resources and direct interference, demonstrated a preference for more degraded sites. We suggest that reduced-impact logging policies that minimize forest disturbance, as well as the rehabilitation of highly degraded areas that have already been logged, will provide added benefits in terms of invasion resistance, in addition to well-documented direct benefits in terms of carbon and biodiversity (Putz et al 2008b). Without these, we risk compromising the biodiversity value of logged secondary forests by facilitating the spread of invasive species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such questions would also arise if a REDD scheme would account for carbon stocks in wood products such as furniture. The case of Vietnam also shows that, in policies like REDD, forest degradation is as critical as deforestation (40).…”
Section: Relevance For Reducing Emissions From Deforestation and Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hal ini dapat berakibat pada potensi meningkatnya jumlah pohon yang dapat ditebang yang berarti meningkatnya degradasi hutan. Beberapa penelitian di hutan alam sekunder menyebutkan bahwa jumlah pohon yang dipanen dalam satu hektar sangat menentukan kelestarian produksi hutan (Bertault and Sist, 1997;Sist et al, 1998;Sist et al, 2003b), walaupun telah dilakukan teknik pemanenan yang berdampak rendah (Reduced Impact Logging/RIL) yang dipercaya dapat mengurangi kerusakan tegakan tinggal (Putz et al, 2008b;Sasaki et al, 2012) (Putz et al, 2008a;Putz et al, 2008b;Sasaki et al, 2012). Selain itu, daur tebangan juga diperpendek dari 35 tahun menjadi 30 tahun, yang berarti dapat diasumsikan bahwa tegakan tinggal yang sama akan menghasilkan tegakan yang kurang lebih sama pada pada saat sebelum penebangan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified