2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/3294674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Variable Step Size Least Mean Square Algorithm for Pipeline Noise

Abstract: In this study, we employ the active noise control (ANC) method to eliminate the low-frequency part of the noise generated by the rotation of the axial fan in heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) pipelines. Because the traditional variable step size least mean square (VSS-LMS) algorithm has poor tracking performance, we propose a variable step size filtered-X least mean square (FXLMS) algorithm based on the arctangent function to improve the adaptive filtering method of the convergence speed and no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While all three algorithms aim to reduce the difference between the expected and observed outputs by modifying the filter coefficients, their techniques and potency levels differ. The VFF-RLS approach has to a greater extent an advantage over the LMS algorithm [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The VFF-RLS algorithm converges quicker than the other two algorithms, making it suited to scenarios requiring rapid adaptation to changes in the input data.…”
Section: Contribution Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While all three algorithms aim to reduce the difference between the expected and observed outputs by modifying the filter coefficients, their techniques and potency levels differ. The VFF-RLS approach has to a greater extent an advantage over the LMS algorithm [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. The VFF-RLS algorithm converges quicker than the other two algorithms, making it suited to scenarios requiring rapid adaptation to changes in the input data.…”
Section: Contribution Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VFF-RLS technique outperforms in non-stationary settings with varying statistical characteristics of input signals over time. Because of potential concerns with the step size parameter, the performance of the LMS, RLS, and VFF-RLS algorithms may decrease [36][37][38]. The need for dynamic modification of these variables, in particular, may have a significant influence on the algorithm's adaption rate.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Vff-rls-based Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C ′ (z) can estimate the statute of C(z) precisely which is required in the algorithm, and the two are approximately equal. Adding the estimation C ′ (z) of the secondary path transmission function improves the LMS algorithm and indeed becomes the essential difference between FXLMS and LMS algorithms [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Fxlms Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANC of low-frequency air-conditioning sound in pipes is carried out using a variable-step FXLMS algorithm posses an arctangent function. Compared with the traditional FXLMS algorithm, it notable raise the convergence speed, and the maximum noise reduction amount reaches 17dB [3]. In [4], a frequency-domain ANC algorithm is proposed to reduce the acoustic noise in magnetic resonance image formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%