SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference 2009
DOI: 10.2118/120278-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Waste Injection Monitoring and Modified Operational Procedures: The Keys to Prolong Well Storage Capacity

Abstract: Waste generated during exploration, development, and production of oil and gas fields are required to be disposed in a responsible and environmentally friendly manner. Over the years, environmental regulations governing the disposal of such waste have tightened and each day regulatory agencies are demanding more stringent policies, especially for remote and environmentally sensitive areas. Waste Injection (WI) has been proven over the past decade to be the safest and most efficient technology for final disposa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides all that was mentioned above, subsurface injections of drilling waste makes the continuous use of oil-based mud during drilling troubled shale formations in environmentally sensitive areas possible [25]. Deep underground waste injections (cutting reinjection (CRI) or downhole waste injection (DWI)) are still the most economic methods for the disposal of waste generated through exploration and production activities in comparison with other available waste disposal methods [26,27]. For example, in the period of two years (concluded by March 2000), in Port Fourchon (Louisiana), more than 160,000 m 3 of waste produced by drilling and production activities containing naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) has been injected into a single well with an average cost of $119.5 per cubic meter of waste material, which is far less in comparison with the off-site waste disposal, with an estimated cost of $629 per cubic meter of the same waste material [18].…”
Section: Overview Of Oil and Gas Exploration And Production Waste Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides all that was mentioned above, subsurface injections of drilling waste makes the continuous use of oil-based mud during drilling troubled shale formations in environmentally sensitive areas possible [25]. Deep underground waste injections (cutting reinjection (CRI) or downhole waste injection (DWI)) are still the most economic methods for the disposal of waste generated through exploration and production activities in comparison with other available waste disposal methods [26,27]. For example, in the period of two years (concluded by March 2000), in Port Fourchon (Louisiana), more than 160,000 m 3 of waste produced by drilling and production activities containing naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) has been injected into a single well with an average cost of $119.5 per cubic meter of waste material, which is far less in comparison with the off-site waste disposal, with an estimated cost of $629 per cubic meter of the same waste material [18].…”
Section: Overview Of Oil and Gas Exploration And Production Waste Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No matter which of the above theories is correct, waste slurry injection inevitably leads to changes in local in-situ stress, regardless of the formation that has been selected for injection. Injected waste changes the local stress through three basic mechanisms [27,32,33]:…”
Section: Disposal Domain Characterization During the Planning And Exementioning
confidence: 99%