2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20163901007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement and evaluation of polymer-matrix composite panels with hat stiffeners

Abstract: Abstract. Hat-stiffened composite panels fabricated by co-curing technologies are widely used in the fuselage panel due to the good structural stability and high efficiency of axial load transferring. The bonding capability between the stiffener and skin is a primary criterion to assess the co-curing quality. In this paper, two reinforcement technologies of filling filler in the triangle region and adding split-stopping tape between the stiffener and skin were employed to improve the bonding capability. Effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heimbs et al 18 conducted quasi-static and high-rate dynamic tensile tests on the composite T-joints and found the usage of PEI filler leads to a significant improvement with 23% higher energy absorption of 98 J compared to the carbon braid filler. Li et al 19 investigated the effect of the filler's size and found the strength of stiffener-skin intersection increased by 87% as the filler diameter was increased from 0 to 2.79 mm, but the strength decreased significantly when the diameter of filler exceeded 2.79 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heimbs et al 18 conducted quasi-static and high-rate dynamic tensile tests on the composite T-joints and found the usage of PEI filler leads to a significant improvement with 23% higher energy absorption of 98 J compared to the carbon braid filler. Li et al 19 investigated the effect of the filler's size and found the strength of stiffener-skin intersection increased by 87% as the filler diameter was increased from 0 to 2.79 mm, but the strength decreased significantly when the diameter of filler exceeded 2.79 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%