Extended Abstracts of the 2003 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials 2003
DOI: 10.7567/ssdm.2003.p10-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Data Retention in Floating Gate Flash EEPROM’s with P-Doped Floating Gate

Abstract: Data retention capability is the key to design a highly reliable non-volatile memory cell. We demonstrated in our previous work [1] that the use of p-type floating gate(FG), instead of the commonly used n-type doped FG in an n-channel cell, is feasible for high speed performance as well as better endurance. In this paper, a p-doped floating gate on both n-and p-channel flash cells can be achieved with superior data retention characteristics. Since the p-floating gate cell exhibits a larger tunnel oxide field a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the higher erase voltage also worsens the post cycling punch through disturb (PTD) and program wordline disturb (PWD) due to the higher channel leakage caused by the wordline oxide degradation [4,5]. Stack gate flush with a p-type-floating gate (FG) and used the drain-side program of channel hot electron injection [6,7] was found could also speed programming and had a better retention. Similarly, program efficiency in a split-gate flash with a p-floating gate could be higher as the source-side injection was used [8] due to the change of work function in floating gate poly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the higher erase voltage also worsens the post cycling punch through disturb (PTD) and program wordline disturb (PWD) due to the higher channel leakage caused by the wordline oxide degradation [4,5]. Stack gate flush with a p-type-floating gate (FG) and used the drain-side program of channel hot electron injection [6,7] was found could also speed programming and had a better retention. Similarly, program efficiency in a split-gate flash with a p-floating gate could be higher as the source-side injection was used [8] due to the change of work function in floating gate poly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%