2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.104950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of fracture assessment method for pipe girth weld based on failure assessment diagram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many factors affect the failure risk of girth welds in oil and gas transmission pipelines, but the industry generally agrees that the three key factors are the pipe materials and properties, weld defects, and loads [26,30]. Based on the samples collected, the factors that cause girth weld failures can be divided into three categories: pipe type and performancerelated indicators, defect-related indicators, and load-related indicators.…”
Section: Influencing Factors and Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many factors affect the failure risk of girth welds in oil and gas transmission pipelines, but the industry generally agrees that the three key factors are the pipe materials and properties, weld defects, and loads [26,30]. Based on the samples collected, the factors that cause girth weld failures can be divided into three categories: pipe type and performancerelated indicators, defect-related indicators, and load-related indicators.…”
Section: Influencing Factors and Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For girth welds, Chang [25] used a numerical simulation method based on the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) model to analyze the crack initiation and dynamic fracture behavior of a welded pipe under pure bending load. Wu et al [26]. investigated the effects of the crack size, pipe diameter-thickness ratio, and material parameters on the fracture assessment accuracy of pipe girth welds based on the failure assessment diagram theory and the equivalent stress-strain relationship method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%