2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of historic reinforced concrete/mortars by impregnation and electrochemical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors base the evaluation of the water capillary resistance on the water uptake giving it as a weight gain percentage. Franzoni et al [163] have made reference to the Italian standard UNI 7699:2005 for assessing the effectiveness of impregnation and electrochemical methods as protective surface treatments, and the performance of ethyl silicate for surface protection of concrete [124]. The same authors have also evaluated the water capillary uptake of concrete specimens after treating the concrete surface with ethyl silicate [126] by immersing the treated concrete face, originally in surface-dry conditions, into a 3-5 mm layer of deionized water, and weighting at different times between 4 minutes and 24 hours.…”
Section: Moisture Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors base the evaluation of the water capillary resistance on the water uptake giving it as a weight gain percentage. Franzoni et al [163] have made reference to the Italian standard UNI 7699:2005 for assessing the effectiveness of impregnation and electrochemical methods as protective surface treatments, and the performance of ethyl silicate for surface protection of concrete [124]. The same authors have also evaluated the water capillary uptake of concrete specimens after treating the concrete surface with ethyl silicate [126] by immersing the treated concrete face, originally in surface-dry conditions, into a 3-5 mm layer of deionized water, and weighting at different times between 4 minutes and 24 hours.…”
Section: Moisture Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. It was reported that the experimental corrosion test showed that corrosion risk classes of some mortar samples after such immersion treatment passed from a high level to a low one [83].…”
Section: Steel Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, drawbacks of these composites are the high price and high temperature sensitivity [2]. 7) In order to increase the bond strength of the embedded plain steel bars in existing structures without any need for demolition and realkalization, the deep impregnation of cement-based mortars and concrete with a solution of ethyl silicate and with electrochemical treatments by means of a solution of sodium carbonate was investigated [83]. The set-up of electrochemical treatment was presented in Fig.…”
Section: Steel Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impregnation of the surface of the overlay by different coatings (e.g., epoxy, acrylic, polyurethane, cementitious, polymer/clay nanocomposites) can increase its durability, as well as improve many functional parameters such as adhesive resistant, chemical resistance, chloride permeability, hardness, impermeability, abrasion resistance, heat resistance, shrinkage, etc. [120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129].…”
Section: Overview Of Recent Activities Used To Improve the Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%