1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01196738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of reproducibility of trace analysis by spark-source mass-spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The foregoing results refute claims th a t other sources of poor reproducibility, such as geo metrical effects of the electrodes in the spark source (Y anagihari al. 1978;Pustovit & Sikharulidze 1981) cannot be eliminated. It is well known th at param eters such as spark gap and spark position affect the precision and the accuracy of the method (M agee & Harrison I973)* However, results indicate th at if adequate precautions are taken, relative standard deviations of the order of 5-10 % can be obtained (Skogerboe al.…”
Section: A Ccurate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foregoing results refute claims th a t other sources of poor reproducibility, such as geo metrical effects of the electrodes in the spark source (Y anagihari al. 1978;Pustovit & Sikharulidze 1981) cannot be eliminated. It is well known th at param eters such as spark gap and spark position affect the precision and the accuracy of the method (M agee & Harrison I973)* However, results indicate th at if adequate precautions are taken, relative standard deviations of the order of 5-10 % can be obtained (Skogerboe al.…”
Section: A Ccurate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of the ion intensity ratio of the analyte and internal standard from the same exposure in determining elemental concentrations can minimize the effect of spark variations (36). The effect of changes in the gap width and ion charge distribution can be minimized by stabilizing the intensities of the matrix lines (184). The positioning of the spark with respect to the entrance slit should be consistent (28,177).…”
Section: Photographic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spark position determines what portion of the inhomogeneous spark plasma is sampled by the mass spectrograph (38,(175)(176)(177)179,180). Other factors concern variations in the ion current at the monitor (177,185) and the spark discharge with time caused by circuitry instability, aging, and other time related variations (171,184). Also, the vacuum in the ion source should be consistent (28).…”
Section: Photographic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of the ion intensity ratio of the analyte and internal standard from the same exposure in determining elemental concentrations can minimize the effect of spark variations (36). The effect of changes in the gap width and ion charge distribution can be minimized by stabilizing the intensities of the matrix lines (184). The positioning of the spark with respect to the entrance slit should be consistent (28,177).…”
Section: Photographic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spark position determines what portion of the inhomogeneous spark plasma is sampled by the mass spectrograph (38,(175)(176)(177)179,180). Other factors concern variations in the ion current at the monitor (177,185) and the spark discharge with time caused by circuitry instability, aging, and other time related variations (171,184). Also, the vacuum in the ion source should be consistent (28).…”
Section: Photographic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%