2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2007.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of signal-to-noise ratio in digital holography using wavelet transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining Equations 11, 18, 19, as well as the definition of fringe visibility in Equation 15 and average electric field intensity in Equation 16, results in the following expression for phase error due to the three bucket/step method. …”
Section: Four Bucket/step Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining Equations 11, 18, 19, as well as the definition of fringe visibility in Equation 15 and average electric field intensity in Equation 16, results in the following expression for phase error due to the three bucket/step method. …”
Section: Four Bucket/step Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods to reduce noise include phase error compensation, spatial light modulation (SLM), and multiple frequency overlapping [9] [10][11][12][13], which improve the contrast of phase measurements. Noise reduction is also accomplished by filtering certain frequencies, both in the spatial and Fourier planes, with Butterworth filters and masks, respectively [14,15] [6]. In addition, efficient encoding methods and correlation based de-noising algorithms have been developed to significantly reduce speckle noise [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the digital processing perspective take advantage of the digital part involved in DH to intervene by using different filtering techniques in either the final reconstructed image [23][24][25] or the numerical reconstruction step [18][19][20][21][22]. Amongst these digital techniques exist classical filters like mean or median filtering [25], wavelet transform filtering [24] or nonlocal means filtering [23] that operate when the reconstructed image has been obtained. Other approaches intervene in the numerical process of reconstruction modifying the obtained hologram by discrete Fourier filtering [18], using binary masks [19,20], random resampling masks [22] or using a sparsity denoising technique [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods to reduce noise include phase error compensation, spatial light modulation (SLM), and multiple frequency overlapping [13][14][15][16], which improve the reconstructed phase image of holograms. Noise reduction is also accomplished by filtering certain frequencies, both in the spatial and Fourier planes, with Butterworth filters and masks, respectively [17][18][19]. In addition, efficient encoding methods and correlation based de-noising algorithms have been developed to significantly reduce speckle noise [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%