2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00139-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of system order reduction via balancing using the method of singular perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional term is added to the transfer function of the fast subsystem as seen in the new scheme depicted in Figure 8. It was shown in [4] that such a corrected DC gain approach works well for reduced-order models obtained via balancing [4], [13]. The corrected response of the example considered earlier is shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Discussion On the Singular Perturbation Approach For Order R...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An additional term is added to the transfer function of the fast subsystem as seen in the new scheme depicted in Figure 8. It was shown in [4] that such a corrected DC gain approach works well for reduced-order models obtained via balancing [4], [13]. The corrected response of the example considered earlier is shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Discussion On the Singular Perturbation Approach For Order R...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The previous strategy plus some extra (technical) interconnection conditions guarantee that the origin (x, z) = (0, 0) ∈ R ns × R n f is an asymptotically stable equilibrium point of the closed-loop system ( 6) for ε > 0 but sufficiently small [14,24,25,33]. This feature of normal hyperbolicity has been exploited in many applications, a few examples are [10,34,38,43,51,52,54,55].…”
Section: Composite Control Of Slow-fast Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balancing singularly perturbed linear systems has been considered in several research papers [1824]. Due to the structure of the singularly perturbed matrices (15) and (16), the controllability and observability Gramians are partitioned as follows [25] Pfalse(εfalse)thinmathspace=thinmathspace][P1false(εfalse)P2false(εfalse)P2Tfalse(εfalse)1εP3false(εfalse),1emQfalse(εfalse)thinmathspace=thinmathspace][Q1false(εfalse)εQ2false(εfalse)εQ2Tfalse(εfalse)εQ3false(εfalse)To simplify notation, in the rest of the paper we have omitted explicit dependency of Pj, j=1,2,3 on ε.…”
Section: Balancing Singularly Perturbed Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its system matrix eigenvalues indicate that this system has three slow and five fast state variables. The eigenvalues are given by right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptλFCthinmathspace=thinmathspacefalsefalse{1.4038,1.6473,2.9151,18.2582,22.4040,46.1768,89.4853,219.6262falsefalse}Since the small singular perturbation parameter is not exactly known, it can be evaluated as the ratio of the fastest eigenvalue of the slow cluster with the slowest eigenvalue of the fast cluster, namely ε=2.9151/18.2582=0.157 [24, 30]. The system, input, and output matrices are obtained by permuting rows and columns of the original mathematical model matrices from [29] in order to get the explicit singularly perturbed form defined in (15) and (16).…”
Section: Balancing Singularly Perturbed Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation