1990
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.84.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the Gross Theory of β-Decay. II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the new half-lives for very-neutron rich Zn and Ga isotopes have questioned the global β-decay calculations in this region whichdo not properly account for ground state spin-parity inversion and the firstforbidden transitions.The "Gross Theory" [8], parameterization underestimate both old and new Zn, Ga data significantly (not shown in figures 1,2). Thus, it can not provide a reliable r-process modeling in specific region of 78 Ni.…”
Section: Global Modelsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the new half-lives for very-neutron rich Zn and Ga isotopes have questioned the global β-decay calculations in this region whichdo not properly account for ground state spin-parity inversion and the firstforbidden transitions.The "Gross Theory" [8], parameterization underestimate both old and new Zn, Ga data significantly (not shown in figures 1,2). Thus, it can not provide a reliable r-process modeling in specific region of 78 Ni.…”
Section: Global Modelsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Below we compare the experimental half-lives and delayed neutron emission total P n -values with the ones from the global models [8][9][10][11][12] figures 1, 2) show the semimicroscopic global models fail to describe the ground state properties in the most neutron rich region of nuclear chart. Description of spherical sub-shell closure at N=58 [1] is beyond their performance.…”
Section: Global Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• for compiled experimental and theoretical β-decay and electron capture rates: -the experimental β-decay rates of Katakura (1996); -the β-decay rates of Takahashi & Yokoi (1987, see also Goriely 1999; -specific electron capture rates from various published sources; -β-decay rates calculated with the revised Gross theory (Tachibana et al 1990) and Q-values from the HFB-14 mass model; -β-decay rates calculated with the QRPA plus FRDM models by Möller et al (1996); -the density-and temperature-dependent β-decay rates calculated by Oda et al (1994) or Langanke & Martinez-Pinedo (2000).…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous publication [9], the present authors applied the summation method fully based on the individual calculated spectra with the generation-2 version of the gross theory of beta decay [10][11][12]. Though the overall agreement of the calculated results with the experimental data by Shreckenbach et al were fairly good, the C/E values varied from 1.0 to 1.3 even in the 3 ∼ 6 MeV region where the gross approximation is most definitely valid and also the spectra are important for applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%