2003
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3834:iotmst>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the Multimodel Superensemble Technique for Seasonal Forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
111
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intent is that some of the biases inherent in the different models will offset so that the superensemble produces more accurate predictions than those generated by any individual model. Such improvement has indeed been observed [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The intent is that some of the biases inherent in the different models will offset so that the superensemble produces more accurate predictions than those generated by any individual model. Such improvement has indeed been observed [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The simplest multimodel technique is the "Poor Man Ensemble", which is an average of different models, without any bias correction or weighting ("equal weighting"), while more sophisticated approaches suggest applying model weights according to some measure of performance ("optimum weighting"). The results confirm that equally weighted multimodels on average outperform the single models (Krishnamurti et al, 1999(Krishnamurti et al, , 2000Yun et al, 2003), and that projection errors can in principle be further reduced by optimum weighting. However, this not only requires accurate knowledge of the single model skill, but the relative contributions of the joint model error and unpredictable noise also need to be known to avoid biased weights (Weigel et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, the simple multi-model average does not take into account the quality differences between the models; therefore, it is expected that a weighted average, with weights based on the past performances of the models, will provide better predictions than the simple average. As expected, it was shown that the weighted average of climate models can improve predictions when using ensembles of AGCMs (Rajagopalan et al, 2002;Robertson et al, 2004;Yun et al, 2003), AOGCMs (Yun et al, 2005;Pavan and Doblas-Reyes, 2000;Chakraborty and Krishnamurti, 2009) and regional climate models (Feng et al,…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%