2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the non-destructive evaluation of plasma facing components by data combination of infrared thermal images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H1 map represents information on the confidence in the presence of the defect. In the W7-X target pre series case, specific tiles (#5, 6,7,8,9) of the target element -4S008 -showed an abnormal evolution of their tile surface temperature during the heating cycles at 10MW/m² due to apparently bonding failures. Figure 4 shows the dTref_max mapping after HHF testing.…”
Section: -Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The H1 map represents information on the confidence in the presence of the defect. In the W7-X target pre series case, specific tiles (#5, 6,7,8,9) of the target element -4S008 -showed an abnormal evolution of their tile surface temperature during the heating cycles at 10MW/m² due to apparently bonding failures. Figure 4 shows the dTref_max mapping after HHF testing.…”
Section: -Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preliminary study carried out on calibrated defects allowed to validate the method [9] and showed the benefit of the data merging on the detection of defects (Fig.6). …”
Section: -Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data fusion is more and more employed in the NDT domain. The more commonly used methods are based on classification (like Dempster-Shafer theory) in particular for image fusion [3][4][5][6][7]. Data fusion is also already used for assessing civil engineering components [4][5]8].…”
Section: Data Fusion Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dempster-Shafer method is based on decision making on three hypotheses: the hypothesis H1 characterizes the presence of a defect; the hypothesis H2 corresponds to the absence of defect; and the hypothesis H3 corresponds to ignorance, characterizing hesitation relative to the nature of the defect. A simple rule suggested in the literature [10] is to base the final decision on the value of the hypothesis H3 and H1. Considering the present available experimental database obtained on mock-ups with artificial calibrated defects, Fig.…”
Section: Upgraded Acceptance Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%