2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in the numerical prediction of fully-suspended slurry flow in horizontal pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eddy viscosity, ν t , was evaluated by an extension of the standard high-Reynolds form of the k-ε model of Launder and Spalding (1974) to two-phase flows, which is well documented in Messa et al (2013Messa et al ( , 2014Messa et al ( , 2015.…”
Section: Methodology Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eddy viscosity, ν t , was evaluated by an extension of the standard high-Reynolds form of the k-ε model of Launder and Spalding (1974) to two-phase flows, which is well documented in Messa et al (2013Messa et al ( , 2014Messa et al ( , 2015.…”
Section: Methodology Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid-solid flow, also known as slurry flow, is commonplace in industrial applications. In the past years, considerable efforts have been devoted to several important indicators of slurry flow in horizontal pipe, such as pressure gradient [1][2][3][4][5], concentration and velocity distribution [6][7][8][9][10][11], and critical deposition velocity [12][13][14]. However, the existing studies have been limited to circular tubes with greater-than-50.7mm diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Messa and Malavasi [20] proposed a new two-fluid model for the simulation of fully suspended liquid-solid slurry flows in horizontal pipes. The model is claimed to address wall boundary conditions for solid phase, viscosity of the slurry mixture which incorporates particle shape, and a solution algorithm which reduces computational burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%