Improvements in tissue blood flow and lumbopelvic stability after lumbopelvic core stabilization training in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Paungmali, Aatit; Joseph, Leonard; Sitilertpisan, Patraporn; Pirunsan, Ubon; Uthaikhup, Sureeporn

doi:10.1589/jpts.28.635

Cited by 27 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A 48‐hour interval was given between sessions in order to prevent a possible cumulative effect on the variables. All of the participants performed the lumbopelvic core stabilization exercise based on an established protocol . A Pilates power gym transformer (Thane Fitness, London, U.K.) was used by participants to perform the lumbopelvic core stabilization exercises in the supine crook lying position with the hip and knee in 70° and 90° of flexion, respectively.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a study conducted by Paungmali et al [13], 25 individuals with chronic low back pain underwent three experimental conditions: lumbopelvic stabilization training (using a biofeedback pressure unit); placebo (automated cycling); and control (rest). As a result, there was an improvement in stability after muscle strength training in the lumbopelvic regio, thus reaffirming that described previousl by Goulart et al [12]y.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acute evaluation of static and dynamic stability of the lumbopelvic region after paravertebral stretching

Coracini¹,

Bortoletto²,

Provensi³

et al. 2019

J Pre Clin Clin Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and objectives. Since the paravertebral muscles promote dynamic stability to protect the spine, the aim of this study was to verify the association between the acute effect of the stretching support time for the multifidus muscle, and changes in the static and dynamic stability of the lumbopelvic region. Materials and method. A total of 46 volunteers were cross-submitted to three different stretching interventions for the multifidus muscle, being the manutention of stretching time the variation between interventions: 10, 30 and 60 seconds. Each volunteer was submitted to the three interventions with a minimum interval of 7 days and a maximum of 10 days. The order of the interventions was determined by lot. First, pre-intervention values for static and dynamic stability were collected using a biofeedback pressure unit. Subsequently, the sample was forwarded for intervention according to its group; after the completion of the same, data were collected on post-intervention stability. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software and Chi-square test, with a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05).Results. There was no significant association between the manutention of stretching time and static stability, being χ2(4)=0.812; p=0.949. Similarly, there was no significant association between the stretching support time and dynamic stability, and χ2(4)=1.517; p=0.827. Conclusion. In conclusion, there was no significant association between stretching time of the paravertebral muscles and static and dynamic stability.

show abstract

“…A total of three measurements were taken and the mean value of the 3 trials was used for further analysis. The TBF over the tissue at the lumbar region was measured as per a previously established protocol (15,22). A laser Doppler blood flow meter (Moor instruments DRT4, UK) was used to measure the TBF in flux/min with the participants in prone position.…”

Section: Randomization Of Participants (N = 16)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The LPST was performed as per an established protocol (15,16,21). A total of 3 days of LPST interventions were applied with an interval of 24 hours rest between each session.…”

Section: Lumbopelvic Stability Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. core muscle thickness, increases spinal stability, restrains abnormal movements at lumbar spine, reduces lumbar pain and prevents injury of lumbopelvic region (14)(15)(16). On the other hand, SMT assists warming up of muscles, reduces muscle soreness, improves circulation, removes metabolic waste, and promotes relaxation (17)(18)(19).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Effects Between Core Stability Training and Sports Massage Therapy Among Elite Weightlifters with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Cross-Over Study

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Lumbopelvic stability training (LPST) and massage therapy are common therapies used for pain reduction and management of low back pain. However, the effects of LPST and sports massage therapy (SMT) for management of chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) among elite weightlifters have never been studied before. Objectives: The current study investigates the therapeutic effects of LPST and SMT on pain intensity (PI), pain pressure threshold (PPT) and tissue blood flow (TBF) among elite weightlifters with CLBP. Methods: A total of 16 female athletes training for the international and Olympic weightlifting competitions participated in a randomized balanced cross-over study. The athletes were randomized into three sessions of LPST and SMT with a time interval of 24 hours within sessions and a wash out period of 4 weeks between the sessions. The PI, PPT and TBF were measured before and after each session repeatedly in both groups of interventions. The changes in the PI, PPT and TBF within and between the groups were analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]. Results: The results demonstrated a reduction of PI (P = 0.01), increase in PPT (P = 0.01) and improvement of TBF (P = 0.01) among the participants in both groups of interventions. The SMT group showed a trend of greater therapeutic benefits when compared to LPST group especially in PI (P = 0.001). Conclusions:The findings suggest positive evidence on the therapeutic effects of LPST and SMT for management of CLBP among elite weightlifters with improvement in PI, PPT and TBF. Coaches, clinicians, and athletes may consider LPST and SMT as useful interventions for management of CLBP among elite weightlifters.

show abstract

Improvements in tissue blood flow and lumbopelvic stability after lumbopelvic core stabilization training in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Cited by 27 publications

References 25 publications

Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Lumbopelvic Core Stabilization Exercise and Pain Modulation Among Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Acute evaluation of static and dynamic stability of the lumbopelvic region after paravertebral stretching

Comparison of Effects Between Core Stability Training and Sports Massage Therapy Among Elite Weightlifters with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Cross-Over Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About