2013
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements of explicit crack surface representation and update within the generalized finite element method with application to three‐dimensional crack coalescence

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents improvements to three-dimensional crack propagation simulation capabilities of the generalized finite element method. In particular, it presents new update algorithms suitable for explicit crack surface representations and simulations in which the initial crack surfaces grow significantly in size (one order of magnitude or more). These simulations pose problems in regard to robust crack surface/front representation throughout the propagation analysis. The proposed techniques are appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly important in the class of problems considered here because the initial crack surface grows in size by orders of magnitude. Details on these algorithms for geometrical crack surface updating and remeshing are described in . After updating the geometrical crack surface, the 3D GFEM mesh is unrefined to the initial mesh provided by the user. The algorithm is then repeated.…”
Section: Crack Propagation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important in the class of problems considered here because the initial crack surface grows in size by orders of magnitude. Details on these algorithms for geometrical crack surface updating and remeshing are described in . After updating the geometrical crack surface, the 3D GFEM mesh is unrefined to the initial mesh provided by the user. The algorithm is then repeated.…”
Section: Crack Propagation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use surface meshes composed of flat triangles (facets) to represent the geometry and handle updates of 3‐D fracture surfaces. Fracture growth is achieved by the addition of triangles or the stretching of the fracture front vertices . The fracture surface mesh has no degrees of freedom and is independent of the 3‐D GFEM mesh used to solve the problem.…”
Section: Generalized Finite Element Methods For 3‐d Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture growth is achieved by the addition of triangles or the stretching of the fracture front vertices. 36 The fracture surface mesh has no degrees of freedom and is independent of the 3-D GFEM mesh used to solve the problem. An example is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Geometrical Fracture Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For XFEM/GFEM applications, the subdivision of the 3D solid elements needs to be performed for the integration purpose. Both relies on well-developed meshing/re-meshing packages [93,94]. The explicit representation of the crack surfaces by triangulation has been used in meshfree methods as well [34,1,36].…”
Section: Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to alleviate this is to abandon the branch enrichment [1,36]. As a remedy, the crack fronts need to be smoothed through some numerical techniques [93,94]. Similar scenarios occur in Lagrange based BEM for fracture modeling.…”
Section: Crack Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%