2019 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccci.2019.8822152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Accessibility for Dyslexic Impairments using Augmented Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AR studies point towards its high significance in the 21 st century for learners with disabilities (Kellems et al, 2020), with related technology enabling teachers to succeed in satisfying the requirements of students with disabilities by allowing them to experience the real world combined with the virtual one, all the while linking it with reality (Karamanoli & Tsinakos, 2017). Nevertheless, research focused on the use of AR interventions for students with disabilities has yet to be extensively conducted as evidenced by the recommendations of Gupta et al (2019) and Kellems et al (2020). Among the studies that examined intellectually challenged elementary students using AR for teaching fundamental matching skills successfully was carried out by Richard et al (2007), while Smith et al (2016) used AR to examine teaching navigation skills to students with the same disabilities.…”
Section: Augmented Reality (Ar) In the Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AR studies point towards its high significance in the 21 st century for learners with disabilities (Kellems et al, 2020), with related technology enabling teachers to succeed in satisfying the requirements of students with disabilities by allowing them to experience the real world combined with the virtual one, all the while linking it with reality (Karamanoli & Tsinakos, 2017). Nevertheless, research focused on the use of AR interventions for students with disabilities has yet to be extensively conducted as evidenced by the recommendations of Gupta et al (2019) and Kellems et al (2020). Among the studies that examined intellectually challenged elementary students using AR for teaching fundamental matching skills successfully was carried out by Richard et al (2007), while Smith et al (2016) used AR to examine teaching navigation skills to students with the same disabilities.…”
Section: Augmented Reality (Ar) In the Learning Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of metrics collected during application testing, researchers in [ 51 ] measured performance metrics such as reading speed, as well as preferences in fonts, size, text-to-background contrast ratio, line height, etc. The usability analysis conducted in [ 54 ] collected data such as task completion, number of errors, the time required to complete the task, user rating of the experience, and amount of instruction required.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual needs (physical and cognitive impairments) should be taken into account when designing systems for stroke rehabilitation, which is highlighted in [ 57 ] as one of the criteria for designing systems for stroke survivors. In addition, the research described in [ 51 ] has shown that there is no universal solution in terms of font types, sizes, spacing, and contrast for people with dyslexia. Therefore, personalization at the individual level is very important to improve both accessibility and user experience.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the majority of the studies that included a specific group of people with cognitive disabilities explored web accessibility issues for people with dyslexia [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Not surprisingly, these studies all explored elements of text-based webpages or web applications and highlighted a need for more graphical and/or visual presentation of online information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 45 studies reviewed, 31 directly investigated websites, web applications, or web-based tools that support web accessibility for PwCDs. Many studies, 14 to be exact, either developed novel tools through the study or explored the use of novel tools created by the authors [ 31 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 47 , 50 , 51 , 58 , 60 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ]. Additionally, 17 studies [ 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 42 , 45 , 49 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 62 , 67 , 68 , 69 ] investigated the potential for existing apps or web-based tools to support web accessibility for PwCDs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%