2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving children's cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D Immersive Virtual Reality environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the enhanced presence did not directly predict learning effectiveness. Unlike the evidence showing that HMDs provide a more enhanced level of presence, studies focusing on the relationship between perceived presence and learning have both positive (Alhalabi, ; Passig, Tzuriel, & Eshel‐Kedmi, ) to neutral (Moreno & Mayer, ) and negative (Makransky, Terkildsen, & Mayer, ) results. For example, Makransky et al () found that an immersive VR science simulation with HMDs not only increased learners' presence but also induced a higher cognitive load than the less immersive desktop‐based VR simulation, which, according to them, resulted in lower learning outcomes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the enhanced presence did not directly predict learning effectiveness. Unlike the evidence showing that HMDs provide a more enhanced level of presence, studies focusing on the relationship between perceived presence and learning have both positive (Alhalabi, ; Passig, Tzuriel, & Eshel‐Kedmi, ) to neutral (Moreno & Mayer, ) and negative (Makransky, Terkildsen, & Mayer, ) results. For example, Makransky et al () found that an immersive VR science simulation with HMDs not only increased learners' presence but also induced a higher cognitive load than the less immersive desktop‐based VR simulation, which, according to them, resulted in lower learning outcomes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recently, the benefits of adding electronic technology to a dynamic testing design have been examined by several researchers (e.g., Passig, Tzuriel, & Eshel‐Kedmi, ; Poehner & Lantolf, ; Resing & Elliott, ; Stevenson, Touw, & Resing, ). Incorporating electronic displays is believed to contribute to the development of children's cognitive skills (e.g., Clements & Samara, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional value of computerized testing can be attributed to the flexibility with which problems can be solved, which can promote more adaptive prompting during training. Research has shown that children benefit from computer‐assisted learning (Tamim, Bernard, Borokhovski, Abrami, & Schmid, ), and computerized dynamic testing has shown positive results in relation to children's accuracy on cognitive tasks (e.g., Passig et al ., ; Poehner & Lantolf, ; Resing & Elliott, ; Resing, Steijn, Xenidou‐Dervou, Stevenson, & Elliott, ; Stevenson et al ., ; Tzuriel & Shamir, ). In the current study, we developed a computerized, tablet‐based dynamic test of inductive reasoning, which enabled us to examine the following two aims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research reveals that 3D information may be useful for children’s performance in other kinds of cognitive tasks. For example, it creates a more effective mode of representation for children’s sequential time perception compared to 2D pictorial scripts4; teaching in a 3D environment improves children’s cognitive modifiability relative to a 2D environment5. Moreover, 3D virtual reality can increase the awareness of teenagers about the social and emotional experiences of their classmates6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%