2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving density estimation in large cross-section timber from existing structures optimizing the number of non-destructive measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bobadilla et al [29] proposed a measure per meter, and if possible, in different faces. For structural timber members, Osuna-Sequera et al [54] recommended to carry out a minimum number of three or four measurements using Wood Extractor, commencing readings in the central one-third of the piece (the area of the maximum bending moment)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bobadilla et al [29] proposed a measure per meter, and if possible, in different faces. For structural timber members, Osuna-Sequera et al [54] recommended to carry out a minimum number of three or four measurements using Wood Extractor, commencing readings in the central one-third of the piece (the area of the maximum bending moment)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is higher than the one obtained with the Pylodin, but lower than those related to the other three test methodologies. Similarly, Osuna-Sequera et al 2019 [11] compared the NPR, SWR and DCE methods in order to optimize the number of measurements to be performed along extended wooden elements where the density variation, due to the growth of the original tree, becomes important from one end to the other. Then, they demonstrate that the penetration depth measured with the WP is considerably influenced by the position of the test area reaching differences up to 5 mm between the bottom of the original tree and a section 10 meters high.…”
Section: Woodpeckermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this is not possible in existing structures, for which density needs to be estimated. To this aim, several techniques have been tested and proposed, including, e.g., core drilling, screw withdrawal, needle penetration resistance and the analysis of the residue of a conventional drill [5][6][7]. According to the cited literature, these methods have been proven to be suitable for estimating the density of the wooden elements in situ but still require the extraction of material (coring was found to be the best method, and, of course, the bigger the core, the higher the correlation with the density) or only evaluate a relatively superficial area of the beam (needle penetration or screw withdrawal).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%