1984
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198403000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Drug Prescribing in a Primary Care Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous literature has supported the rationale that computerized, summative feedback will alter behavior (Gehlbach, Wilkinson, Hammond, Clapp, Finn, & Taylor et al, 1984). The findings of this investigation support these findings, but the hypothesis that both the perceived knowledge and likelihood to pursue CE would change together due to feedback were not supported by the results.…”
Section: Predictors Of Pursuing Continuing Education and Perceived Kncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Previous literature has supported the rationale that computerized, summative feedback will alter behavior (Gehlbach, Wilkinson, Hammond, Clapp, Finn, & Taylor et al, 1984). The findings of this investigation support these findings, but the hypothesis that both the perceived knowledge and likelihood to pursue CE would change together due to feedback were not supported by the results.…”
Section: Predictors Of Pursuing Continuing Education and Perceived Kncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The most promising method of improving prescribing practices of physicians in office-based practices has been the use of brief one-to-one educational outreach visits by either specially trained clinical pharmacists (Avorn & Soumerai 1983, 1986 or physician counsellors (Gehlbach et al 1984;Schaffner et al 1983). This method has been shown to substantially reduce inappropriate prescribing of contraindicated or expensive antibiotics, ineffective drugs for geriatric patients with peripheral vascular disease or senility, addictive analgesics and psychoactive drugs.…”
Section: Nonregulatory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the paper record does not routinely provide a timely display of aggregated data as a disease management view, it does not facilitate the time needed to adequately document the encounter, assess the status of the patient, and plan appropriate counseling, testing, and referrals. Because of this problem, a variety of strategies, such as flow sheets, reminder cards, and patient record books, have been used to supplement the paper record, facilitate the recognition of key clinical data, and prompt the provider (and patient) to comply with standards of care (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%