2010 IEEE International Test Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/test.2010.5699250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving fault diagnosis accuracy by automatic test set modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the following section another method for fault detection and localization is described, based on the estimation of the fault probability of the system components. This method was inspired by the work of Amati et al [27,28], in which they make use of Bayesian Belief Network to model the 12 …”
Section: Probabilistic Fault Detection and Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the following section another method for fault detection and localization is described, based on the estimation of the fault probability of the system components. This method was inspired by the work of Amati et al [27,28], in which they make use of Bayesian Belief Network to model the 12 …”
Section: Probabilistic Fault Detection and Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we adopt a model, at a functional level, for the specification of the system under consideration, S, taken from [8] and similar to the one reported in [5], except for the direct use of faults instead of components (which can be seen as aggregators of faults). In particular, a general system S is described as constituted by n c components (C = {c 1 , c 2 , .…”
Section: System Model and Fault/test Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these techniques are based on a low abstraction-level fault model, suitable only for digital circuits of limited size. In [8], authors presented an approach for an automatic modification of the adopted test set to improve diagnostic accuracy. The work focuses on the test vectors to be selected after the first initial phase, when at least one of the executed tests have failed, and the main diagnostic process takes place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fault grading is critical for tracing the root cause of a test failure and is useful for improving both the manufacturing testing process and the manufacturability of the fabrication process [2], [15], [17]. The fault grading quality is evaluated by diagnosis accuracy, a metric that quantifies the likelihood of diagnosis result to be correct and by diagnosis resolution, a metric that quantifies the amount of information revealed by the diagnosis result [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%