2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving flexural characteristics of 3D printed geopolymer composites with in-process steel cable reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In-process reinforcement: Continuous reinforcement is placed as the material is extruded. Researchers confirmed the feasibility of simultaneously entraining steel cables to printed mixtures during the extrusion process [163][164][165][166] (Figure 14a). Despite improving mechanical capacities of printed structures, cable reinforcement fails to address the problem of weak interlayer bonding introduced by the printing process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In-process reinforcement: Continuous reinforcement is placed as the material is extruded. Researchers confirmed the feasibility of simultaneously entraining steel cables to printed mixtures during the extrusion process [163][164][165][166] (Figure 14a). Despite improving mechanical capacities of printed structures, cable reinforcement fails to address the problem of weak interlayer bonding introduced by the printing process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The first attempt in this regard was the entrainment of steel coils by Khoshnevis et al [20]. Following this, many researchers used specially designed print heads to have steel cables incorporated within the deposited layers [148][149][150][151][152]. Mechtcherine et al [153] envisaged an idea of printing steel reinforcement synchronously with concrete using gas arc welding.…”
Section: Tensile Strength and Ductilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one can use alternative binders instead of portland cement to improve sustainability. In this regard, several studies focused on developing 3D printable mixtures with alkali-activated binder systems [90,93,95,99,103,108,109,117,[150][151][152][196][197][198][199], calcium sulfoaluminate cements [128,142,200,201], limestone clay calcined cements [51,[202][203][204], and magnesium potassium phosphate cements [205,206]. However, there are challenges in designing printable concretes with binder systems such as limestone calcined clay due to chemical admixture compatibility issues [207,208].…”
Section: Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of reinforcement into the concrete matrix during the printing process is one of the most challenging issues needed to be dealt with to enable structural applications of 3D printing technology [11,12]. In terms of materials, most of the printable mixtures contain ordinary Portland cement (PC) as the prime binder material due to its inherent thixotropic properties that originate from the combined effect of interparticle, gravitational and inertial forces [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%