Improving fluid balance monitoring on the wards

Abstract

Clinical experience and nursing metrics have consistently identified poor documentation of fluid balance monitoring at Milton Keynes University Hospital, compromising patient safety and quality of care. This project aimed to increase the percentage of fluid balance charts correctly completed on the wards.Three areas for improvement were identified: understanding the importance of good fluid balance monitoring, correct identification of patients requiring monitoring, and ease of completion of fluid balance charts. Three interventions were deployed on two acute medical awards in consecutive cycles; 1) small group education for staff, 2) creation of board magnets to aid the multidisciplinary team to identify patients requiring monitoring, 3) modification of the current fluid balance chart. Questionnaires were utilised to highlight improvements with current charts and measured staff awareness pre and post education. Each intervention was implemented for one week followed by daily surveys for four days to monitor compliance.Initial results showed a range of 6-12 charts used daily per ward. Of these 0-45% of them were correctly filled. Post education there was a reduced number of inappropriate charts. Introduction of board magnets improved correlation between doctors and nurses in identification of patients (52% before, 77% after magnets). Following modification there was a subjective improvement in the quality of chart completion.This study highlighted that understanding and use of fluid balance monitoring can be improved for nurses, health care assistants (HCAs), and doctors. These improvements allow better documentation and safer patient care. As a result, Milton Keynes University Hospital is investing in magnets and modified charts for a Trust-wide pilot. Problem

The Assessment of Nurses’ Knowledge and Practices about Fluid and Electrolytes Monitoring and Administration among Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Case of Punjab Institute of Cardiology

“…It is necessary to know the exact measures of urine, drainage and vomiting output for quality treatment. Such information is also important to prevent the patients from complications like fluid overload (Jeyapala, Gerth, Patel, & Syed, 2015). Similarly, the study noted that fluid monitoring improves the practices of accurate fluid balance documentations (Scales & Pilsworth, 2008).…”

How midwives manage rapid pre‐loading of fluid in women prior to low dose epidurals: A retrospective chart review

“…Furthermore, close to half (145, 49.5%) of women were identified as euvolemic, which seems to be contrary to the fact that most participants were tolerating oral fluids and food until the point of epidural commencement (228, 77.8%); and an additional 106 (36%) already had “maintenance IV fluids” also running. Although fluid balance charts are used internationally to document input and output (Jeyapala, Gerth, Patel, & Syed, ), we identified poor compliance with documentation of rationale for IV fluid administration by midwifery and medical staff. Midwives need to ensure that evidence‐based guidelines underpin their clinical practice to promote and ensure safe practice, reduce adverse events and standardize clinical practice.…”

Education and training as key drivers for improving the quality of fluid balance charts: findings from a quality improvement project

“…In a similar project conducted in Milton Keynes Hospital, less than 45% of the charts surveyed were correctly filled, preintervention. 5 The study also found that many patients who did not necessarily need fluid balance monitoring were being monitored. In Central Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, the Fluid Balance Improvement Project found that only 30% of the charts met their criteria for completion and accuracy.…”