2015
DOI: 10.1364/ao.54.003428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving holographic reconstruction by automatic Butterworth filtering for microelectromechanical systems characterization

Abstract: Digital holographic microscopy is an important interferometric tool in optical metrology allowing the investigation of engineered surfaces with microscale lateral resolution and nanoscale axial precision. In particular, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) surface analysis, conducted by holographic characterization, requires high accuracy for functional testing. The main issues related to MEMS inspection are the superficial roughness and the complex geometry resulting from the several fabrication steps. Here,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods to reduce noise include phase error compensation, spatial light modulation (SLM), and multiple frequency overlapping [9] [10][11][12][13], which improve the contrast of phase measurements. Noise reduction is also accomplished by filtering certain frequencies, both in the spatial and Fourier planes, with Butterworth filters and masks, respectively [14,15] [6]. In addition, efficient encoding methods and correlation based de-noising algorithms have been developed to significantly reduce speckle noise [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods to reduce noise include phase error compensation, spatial light modulation (SLM), and multiple frequency overlapping [9] [10][11][12][13], which improve the contrast of phase measurements. Noise reduction is also accomplished by filtering certain frequencies, both in the spatial and Fourier planes, with Butterworth filters and masks, respectively [14,15] [6]. In addition, efficient encoding methods and correlation based de-noising algorithms have been developed to significantly reduce speckle noise [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods to reduce noise include phase error compensation, spatial light modulation (SLM), and multiple frequency overlapping [13][14][15][16], which improve the reconstructed phase image of holograms. Noise reduction is also accomplished by filtering certain frequencies, both in the spatial and Fourier planes, with Butterworth filters and masks, respectively [17][18][19]. In addition, efficient encoding methods and correlation based de-noising algorithms have been developed to significantly reduce speckle noise [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the requirement of the micro-object measurement, the DH in microscope configuration is allowed to insert a microscope objective (MO) behind the specimen to realize the three-dimensional (3D) information measurement of specimen in micron, even submicron order. The DH imaging in microscope configuration has been paid increasing attention to the 3D morphology measurement applications such as biology [2][3][4][5][6][7], micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) and micro-optical mechanic electronic system (MOEMS) [8][9][10]. The off-axis geometry of DH setup, proposed by Leith and Upatniecks [11], may spatially separate the different diffraction orders only by a single hologram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%