2017
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6090262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Identification of Areas for Ecological Restoration for Conservation by Integrating USLE and MCDA in a GIS-Environment: A Pilot Study in a Priority Region Northern Mexico

Abstract: Nature conservation is critical for securing an adequate supplying of environmental services to humans. Paradoxically, financial resources for conservation are normally scarce and, forest ecosystem restoration activities are expensive. So, a careful and detailed planning is vital for optimizing economic funds when ecosystems restoration practices are implemented. In this work, we developed a methodology to find physically-degraded sites in order to determine both, urgency and feasibility to carry out ecologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Reyes-Cárdenas et al (2017) correlacionaron información de campo con datos espectrales y obtuvieron valores semejantes. Sin embargo, es importante considerar que dentro del área de estudio existen zonas con diferentes niveles de degradación del suelo, por lo que este factor debe integrarse dentro de las evaluaciones de biomasa a través de procedimientos como el análisis multicriterio (Aguirre-Salado et al, 2017). La variabilidad en la cantidad de biomasa también suele corresponder a las condiciones del terreno (topografía, altitud, pendiente, precipitación y temperatura), como lo señalan Olthoff, Martínez-Ruiz y Alday (2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Reyes-Cárdenas et al (2017) correlacionaron información de campo con datos espectrales y obtuvieron valores semejantes. Sin embargo, es importante considerar que dentro del área de estudio existen zonas con diferentes niveles de degradación del suelo, por lo que este factor debe integrarse dentro de las evaluaciones de biomasa a través de procedimientos como el análisis multicriterio (Aguirre-Salado et al, 2017). La variabilidad en la cantidad de biomasa también suele corresponder a las condiciones del terreno (topografía, altitud, pendiente, precipitación y temperatura), como lo señalan Olthoff, Martínez-Ruiz y Alday (2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Alternatively, statistical approaches can be used [24,34,[44][45][46]. Other approaches include empirical models (mainly Universal Soil Loss Equation-USLE, or Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation-RUSLE) [14,18,20,22,23,47], or physically-based models. either spatially distributed or spatially lumped (e.g., Soil Water Assessment Tool-SWAT [12,[48][49][50] and Water Availability in Semi-Arid environments-SEDiments-WASA-SED [51]).…”
Section: Mapping Approaches Under Constraints Of Data Unavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land cover is considered to be one of the most important factors affecting soil erosion and the investigation of soil losses due to differences or changes in land cover types is a popular research topic [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. erefore, field experiments are an ideal method for observing the differences in hydrological characteristics (e.g., runoff) between one experimental area treated with vegetation cover and other experimental areas to assess the effect of vegetation on soil erosion [22,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%