2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-016-0560-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving landmark detection accuracy for self-localization through baseboard recognition

Abstract: Acquiring information related to the surrounding environment and environmental mapping are important issues for realizing autonomous robot movement in an unknown environment, and these processes require position estimations for self-localization. We have conducted previous research related to self-localization in indoor environments through baseboard recognition. In that method, a mobile robot performs self-localization using camera-acquired images, from which the intersection of baseboards and the vertical li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4to the contour image, and calculate the center of gravity ( , ) and the area A by Eqs. (5)- (6). Figures 8(a)…”
Section: B Colored Rectangle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4to the contour image, and calculate the center of gravity ( , ) and the area A by Eqs. (5)- (6). Figures 8(a)…”
Section: B Colored Rectangle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECENT improvements in image processing techniques have advanced research on object detection and classification, and we have been engaged in extensive research in that field [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In these studies, a camera photographs an object and image processing is performed to obtain information about that object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the evolution of computers and related technologies, several studies have been conducted on robots that can perform tasks deemed too risky or difficult for humans. To that end, the focus has been on developing wheeled robots [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], flying robots [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], and snakelike robots [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Many recent studies focus on developing not only robots that perform risky or difficult tasks for humans, but also production robots in workplaces that face labor shortages [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], cleaning robots to support housework to meet the demands of our busy lives [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], and robots to support the medical sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are previous studies that investigate regular travel [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]; however, they focus on simulations and not actual robot operations. The distance traveled by a mobile robot is conventionally measured using an embedded encoder [ 6 , 7 ]. The robot used in this study is not equipped with an encoder; we equipped a compact crawler robot with small hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], the authors classified two groups of sensors based on measurement techniques used: relative positioning sensors such as wheel odometry [1], visual odometry [3] and inertial sensor [4]. On the other hand, absolute positioning sensors such as Global Positioning Systems [5], [6], landmark navigation [7], [8], active beacons [9], ultrasound range sensor [10], light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [11], cameras [12] and magnetic compasses [1]. The two groups have pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%