2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Lidar-based aboveground biomass estimation of temperate hardwood forests with varying site productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ALS metrics most strongly related to the C stocks in Pinus plantations were height metrics (Elev.P90, Elev.mode, Percentage.all.returns.above.mean, Elev.kurtosis, Elev.MAD.median, Elev.minimum, Percentage.all.returns.above.mode, Elev.maximum, Elev.P99), and other ALS-derived metrics concerning the horizontal distribution of the point cloud (Return.1.count, Canopy.relief.ratio, Return.2.count). Metrics generated from ALS data are commonly agreed to be highly correlated with C stocks, and many studies have successfully used height metrics (higher percentiles, mean, and maximum height) as important predictors for their quantification in Mediterranean pine species [23,40,63] and other conifers [14,[64][65][66]. In our study, all the species models used similar metrics, which demonstrates the consistency of the models.…”
Section: The Use Of Als Data and A Knn Model For C Stock Estimationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The ALS metrics most strongly related to the C stocks in Pinus plantations were height metrics (Elev.P90, Elev.mode, Percentage.all.returns.above.mean, Elev.kurtosis, Elev.MAD.median, Elev.minimum, Percentage.all.returns.above.mode, Elev.maximum, Elev.P99), and other ALS-derived metrics concerning the horizontal distribution of the point cloud (Return.1.count, Canopy.relief.ratio, Return.2.count). Metrics generated from ALS data are commonly agreed to be highly correlated with C stocks, and many studies have successfully used height metrics (higher percentiles, mean, and maximum height) as important predictors for their quantification in Mediterranean pine species [23,40,63] and other conifers [14,[64][65][66]. In our study, all the species models used similar metrics, which demonstrates the consistency of the models.…”
Section: The Use Of Als Data and A Knn Model For C Stock Estimationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Destructive methods require cut samples of trees, and the wood is weighted after it has dried (Parresol, ). Indirect methods use allometric equations, in which the conventional variables used include the field‐measured normal diameter and height of the trees (Moore, ; Shao et al, ). The ability of LiDAR to collect a large amount of densely sampled elevation data promises a more efficient and inexpensive tool—developed by training data‐driven expert systems—for forest biomass management (Shao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods use allometric equations, in which the conventional variables used include the field‐measured normal diameter and height of the trees (Moore, ; Shao et al, ). The ability of LiDAR to collect a large amount of densely sampled elevation data promises a more efficient and inexpensive tool—developed by training data‐driven expert systems—for forest biomass management (Shao et al, ). Time series of LiDAR measurements have already been used for forest dynamic monitoring, that is, for monitoring tree growth (Zhao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common prediction methods in model-based or model-assisted forest inventory are e.g., linear models [1][2][3][4][5], non-linear models [6,7], random forest methods [8] and k nearest neighbour (k-NN) [2,[9][10][11] methods. Part of these methods include also information of the uncertainty in plot level predictions of the attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be caused e.g., by poor correlation between extreme values of the attribute and used remotely sensed data based predictors, insufficient number of field measurements of the extreme attribute values in the available training set, or excessive averaging behaviour of the used model. For instance, the above ground biomass (AGB) can generally be predicted using LiDAR or satellite image data with good precision up to some limit, but for AGB values larger than that the models tend to systematically under-estimate the biomass compared to the real values, see e.g., [3,7,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%