2022
DOI: 10.4149/bll_2022_030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion

Abstract: AIM: The aims of our research were as follows: 1) Description of changes in the position of the upper and lower lips, as a result of the change in the position of upper and lower incisors after orthodontic treatment of malocclusion of Class II, division 2 type. 2) Determination of correlation between changes in the position of lips and incisors in the profi le of the face after orthodontic treatment of malocclusion of Class II, division 2 type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study analyses the documentation of 115… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in facial contour after orthodontic treatment were primarily concentrated in the pro le and lower third of the face, which typically results from extraction orthodontics. We believe that this change is bene cial for the overall aesthetic evaluation of patients, consistent with previous research ndings [14]. However, even though orthodontic treatment methods like tooth extraction have improved aesthetic evaluations, there are still individual cases of aesthetic loss in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The changes in facial contour after orthodontic treatment were primarily concentrated in the pro le and lower third of the face, which typically results from extraction orthodontics. We believe that this change is bene cial for the overall aesthetic evaluation of patients, consistent with previous research ndings [14]. However, even though orthodontic treatment methods like tooth extraction have improved aesthetic evaluations, there are still individual cases of aesthetic loss in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…None of the subjects with no systemic diseases did not experience major accidents, orthodontics, and upper respiratory tract diseases. Angle class II malocclusion inclusion criteria [ 17 , 18 ]: ANB is greater than 5°, with deep overjet and molar distal relationship; angle class III malocclusion inclusion criteria: ANB is less than 0°, with bone anterior teeth inversion with molar proximal relationship [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%