2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2009.5353988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving machining accuracy with robot deformation compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, robot stiffness is modeled as six rotational stiffnesses around the z-axes of the joints [5], [11]. Due to lack of sufficient identification data, a linear description of joint stiffness, or compliance (inverse of the stiffness) is used.…”
Section: Stiffness Modeling and Identification Of Industrial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, robot stiffness is modeled as six rotational stiffnesses around the z-axes of the joints [5], [11]. Due to lack of sufficient identification data, a linear description of joint stiffness, or compliance (inverse of the stiffness) is used.…”
Section: Stiffness Modeling and Identification Of Industrial Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been present in literature to overcome these sources of errors. Besides hardware improvements, literature is focusing on online compensation based on additional sensing and actuation [5], [6], [7]. In addition to online compensation, the COMET project presents also approaches how model knowledge can be used in offline COMET steps towards accurate milling with robots: Model identification, offline path compenstation, online tracking and external actuation [8] programming [8] (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify this problem, working pieces are assumed to be in a theoretical position, and all installation errors can be concentrated on the robot coordinate system [8,9]. The fundamental theory of base detection can be illustrated, first, by the actual position being checked through measuring the datum holes on the workpiece when the drilling robot system arrives at the designated location and, second, as the matrix between the theoretical robot coordinate system and the actual robot coordinate system being deduced to a generally correct position of the holes involved in programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan and Wang introduced an online deformation compensation approach based on a robot structure model for controlling the material removal rate. This approach controls the machining force by adjusting the robot feed speed in real time for improving part quality [19][20][21]. Conclusions from Pan and Wang determine that "The pattern of the process structure deformation is related to all of the following parameters: robot configuration, the location in the workspace, and the direction as well as the magnitude of the process force" [20], depicting the relevance to optimize robot configurations in relation to the robot stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%