2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving oxygen incorporation rate on (La0.6Sr0.4)0.98FeO3-δ via Pr2Ni1-xCuxO4+δ surface decoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, by infiltrating Pr 6 O 11 nanoparticles into LSCF/CGO composite electrodes, Khoshkalam et al decreased the ASR c by a factor of 4 to 0.081 Ω cm 2 at 600 °C. [92] The superiority may in part come from Pr dissolving in the ceria (Pr x Ce 1−x O 2−δ (PCO)), which leads to a much higher electronic conductivity than in GDC because of electron hopping between mixed-valence Pr sites (Pr 4+ is easily reduced to Pr 3+ even under oxidizing atmosphere). [93,94] PrO x -based infiltrated electrodes were observed to be fairly stable over a 220 h impedance test.…”
Section: O 2--lt-sofcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, by infiltrating Pr 6 O 11 nanoparticles into LSCF/CGO composite electrodes, Khoshkalam et al decreased the ASR c by a factor of 4 to 0.081 Ω cm 2 at 600 °C. [92] The superiority may in part come from Pr dissolving in the ceria (Pr x Ce 1−x O 2−δ (PCO)), which leads to a much higher electronic conductivity than in GDC because of electron hopping between mixed-valence Pr sites (Pr 4+ is easily reduced to Pr 3+ even under oxidizing atmosphere). [93,94] PrO x -based infiltrated electrodes were observed to be fairly stable over a 220 h impedance test.…”
Section: O 2--lt-sofcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[93,94] PrO x -based infiltrated electrodes were observed to be fairly stable over a 220 h impedance test. [92] It is important to note that the risk of delamination scales with the layer thickness and the square of the TEC mismatch. [95] Hence large TEC mismatches can be tolerated for thin layers.…”
Section: O 2--lt-sofcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing La 0.5 Sr 1.5 MnO 4+δ into La 0.5 Sr 0.5 MnO 3−δ to form La 0.5 Sr 1.5 MnO 4+δ -La 0.5 Sr 0.5 MnO 3−δ , the ORR would be broadened to entire cathode region, and PPD was 936 mW cm −2 at 700 °C (Hou et al, 2020). Porous (La 0.6 Sr 0.4 ) 0.98 FeO 3−δ electrodes impregnated with aqueous nitrate solutions of Pr 2 Ni 0.6 Cu 0.4 O 4 and Pr 2 Ni 0.7 Cu 0.3 O 4 greatly reduced the polarization resistance, from 0.98 Ω cm 2 to 0.13 Ω cm 2 and 0.16 Ω cm 2 at 650 °C (Khoshkalam et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Surface modification of La 0.8 Sr 0.2 FeO 3-δ (LSF) cathode materials via impregnation of nanoparticles are an effective strategy for enhancing the electrochemical performance of SOFCs. For example, Qiuyun Lin, et al, [24] reported a peak power density (MPD) of 726 mW/cm 2 at 750 • C on a La 0.6 Sr 0.4 CoO 3-δ (LCF)-impregnated LSF-GDC cathode, much higher than that of the bare cathode (298 mW/cm 2 ). Tao Hong, et al, [25], also reported an MPD of 0.53 mW/cm 2 at 800 • C, for a BaCO 3-infiltrated LSF cathode, higher than that of a cell with a bare LSF cathode (0.3 mW/cm 2 ) and the polarization resistance was reduced to 0.84 Ω.cm 2 at 700 • C. However, to the best of our knowledge, the surface modification of an LSF-GDC composite cathode via the impregnation of BaCO 3 has not been reported to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%