Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2556195.2556248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving pairwise learning for item recommendation from implicit feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
276
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
276
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in One past study that has observed the di culty of sampling from the huge number of entries is [24]. In a ranking setting they show that SG converges slowly by uniform sampling.…”
Section: Stochastic Gradient (Sg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in One past study that has observed the di culty of sampling from the huge number of entries is [24]. In a ranking setting they show that SG converges slowly by uniform sampling.…”
Section: Stochastic Gradient (Sg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the algorithm generally converges within 10 7 iterations. Moreover, it is worth noting that the learning process can be speeded up by adopting more efficient sampling strategies [Rendle and Freudenthaler 2014]. In sum, the above analysis verifies that the training computations are tractable and able to scale up for large-scale datasets.…”
Section: Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
“…On the other hand, both approaches are originally designed for the rating prediction task [6], which are based on explicit user feedback. However, in most real-world scenarios, only implicit user behavior is observed and there is no explicit rating [22,23]. Besides, the goal of item recommendation is preferred as a ranking task rather than a rating prediction one.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fidelity loss (FL): This loss is introduced by Tsai et al [15] and has been applied in Information Retrieval (IR) task and yielded superior performance. The original function regarding the loss of pairs is defined as (22) where P ij and Pij share the same meanings with the CE loss in Eq. (1).…”
Section: Lambda With Alternative Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%