2021
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual‐energy CT

Abstract: Over the past decade, spectral or dual-energy CT has gained relevancy, especially in oncological radiology. Nonetheless, its use in the radiotherapy (RT) clinic remains limited. This review article aims to give an overview of the current state of spectral CT and to explore opportunities for applications in RT. In this article, three groups of benefits of spectral CT over conventional CT in RT are recognized. Firstly, spectral CT provides more information of physical properties of the body, which can improve do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
(243 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the computational aspects of DECT-based treatment planning discussed in this work, DECT imaging is expected to provide various opportunities to improve the accuracy of multiple parts of the radiotherapy chain. DECT has been suggested to improve image quality and reduce metal artifacts ( 51 ), to improve tumor staging, delineation, and characterization ( 52 , 53 ), and to contribute to improved normal tissue characterization and personalized treatment through physiological quantification ( 46 ). Furthermore, DECT also shows potential for improved dose calculations for treatment modalities other than particle therapy, such as brachytherapy and conventional photon-based teletherapy ( 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond the computational aspects of DECT-based treatment planning discussed in this work, DECT imaging is expected to provide various opportunities to improve the accuracy of multiple parts of the radiotherapy chain. DECT has been suggested to improve image quality and reduce metal artifacts ( 51 ), to improve tumor staging, delineation, and characterization ( 52 , 53 ), and to contribute to improved normal tissue characterization and personalized treatment through physiological quantification ( 46 ). Furthermore, DECT also shows potential for improved dose calculations for treatment modalities other than particle therapy, such as brachytherapy and conventional photon-based teletherapy ( 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths and limitations of the different DECT or spectral CT acquisition techniques currently available have been described in previous works ( 7 , 44 46 ) and are summarized in Supplementary Table 1 , with a focus on applications to particle therapy treatment planning. Additionally, Supplementary Table 2 lists selected publications on the different DECT or spectral CT acquisition techniques to provide an overview of the current state of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emergence of multitarget tracking and optimization, the selection of two parts of the image cannot meet the needs of identifying information. Multiple thresholds are used to segment the image into multiple targets, which is conducive to the calculation of segmentation and reducing the complexity [18][19][20]. Among diverse image segmentation algorithms, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is preferred due to its simplicity, having multiple thresholds, and being widely utilized for image segmentation in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its benefits are also well-known in radiation oncology, namely the improved dose calculation, disease visibility, and personalized treatment, being particularly useful for dose delivery techniques with a steeper dose gradient, such as brachytherapy and proton therapy. It provides more quantitative measurements compared with SECT and is less prone to image noise and beam hardening or metal artifacts, improving the accuracy of the calculated dose [ 60 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%