2017
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2016.0546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Regional Climate Projections by Prioritized Aggregation via Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in response to other studies [43][44][45], the OWA operator was shown to be appropriate for evaluating, prioritizing, and comparing data across countries to SDG13. Determining weights for each indicator based on official data and scientific studies [4,18,25] allowed for prioritizing the most relevant climate change indicators and presenting a more realistic ranking of countries.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, in response to other studies [43][44][45], the OWA operator was shown to be appropriate for evaluating, prioritizing, and comparing data across countries to SDG13. Determining weights for each indicator based on official data and scientific studies [4,18,25] allowed for prioritizing the most relevant climate change indicators and presenting a more realistic ranking of countries.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second research [44] conducted in Spain, the results showed the OWA operator as a robust decision-making tool to assess the performance of future climate projections and to design sustainable policies under uncertainty and risk tolerance [44]. In addition, the methodology made it possible to address stakeholder attitudes and risk preferences regarding actions to be taken and to minimize uncertainties associated with other climate projection methods [44].…”
Section: Climate Change and Owa Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are different from the normalization and aggregation techniques. It is known that various normalization procedures have different advantages and disadvantages (Jahan & Edwards, 2015 ), and several “Aggregation Operators (AOs)” have different functions (Llopis-Albert et al, 2017 ; Liao & Wu, 2020 ; Mishra et al, 2019b ). However, the classical utility value-based methods apply only one normalization technique, which would limit their applications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%