2020
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving robustness and accuracy of predicted daily methane emissions of dairy cows using milk mid‐infrared spectra

Abstract: BACKGROUND: A robust proxy for estimating methane (CH 4 ) emissions of individual dairy cows would be valuable especially for selective breeding. This study aimed to improve the robustness and accuracy of prediction models that estimate daily CH 4 emissions from milk Fourier transform mid-infrared (FT-MIR) spectra by (i) increasing the reference dataset and (ii) adjusting for routinely recorded phenotypic information. Prediction equations for CH 4 were developed using a combined dataset including daily CH 4 me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictive model’s accuracy and generalization are directly related to the training dataset’s quality and representativeness, with greater variability bringing robustness [ 17 ]. Combining data involving different breeds, diets, and coming from different countries, which already demonstrated scientific achievement while predicting methane [ 18 ], fatty acids [ 19 ], or lactoferrin contents [ 20 ], for instance, was in line with this generalized perspective. Using various datasets from different geolocated farms, we aimed to increase the calibration set variability comparatively to studies presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The predictive model’s accuracy and generalization are directly related to the training dataset’s quality and representativeness, with greater variability bringing robustness [ 17 ]. Combining data involving different breeds, diets, and coming from different countries, which already demonstrated scientific achievement while predicting methane [ 18 ], fatty acids [ 19 ], or lactoferrin contents [ 20 ], for instance, was in line with this generalized perspective. Using various datasets from different geolocated farms, we aimed to increase the calibration set variability comparatively to studies presented in Table 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, milk MIR spectra can be obtained routinely at a reasonable cost (already collected for milk payment and/or milk recording). This proxy represents significant interest for large-scale studies (compare animals, herds, periods, geographical regions, and genetic studies) ( Vanlierde et al, 2020 ), but information about the limitation and applicability of milk MIR is lacking.…”
Section: Methods To Estimate Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All milk samples were analysed using Milkoscan FT4000, FT6000, and FT+ (Foss-Electric A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) by the milk laboratory Comité du Lait (Battice, Belgium) to generate the MIR spectral data. Methane emissions (PME, g/d) were predicted from the recorded spectra using the equations developed by Vanlierde et al (2021). To eliminate potential abnormal records, the PME values below the 0.1 percentile and above the 99.9 percentile were deleted (Kandel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%