2016
DOI: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2016.8.mwsf-080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Selection-Channel-Aware Steganalysis Features

Abstract: Currently, the best detectors of content-adaptive steganography are built as classifiers trained on examples of cover and stego images represented with rich media models (features) formed by histograms (or co-occurrences) of quantized noise residuals. Recently, it has been shown that adaptive steganography can be more accurately detected by incorporating content adaptivity within the features by accumulating the embedding change probabilities (change rates) in the histograms. However, because each noise residu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most deep learning researches adopt the 2D network, which ignores the fact of multi-channel signal processing [ 40 ], Table 6 shows that the more channels EEG signal could improve the performance of the network. We proposed the 3D image reconstruction approach to relate multi-channel information, just like in video processing [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most deep learning researches adopt the 2D network, which ignores the fact of multi-channel signal processing [ 40 ], Table 6 shows that the more channels EEG signal could improve the performance of the network. We proposed the 3D image reconstruction approach to relate multi-channel information, just like in video processing [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the consideration of selection-cannel, Denemark el al. [Denemark, Fridrich and Comesaña-Alfaro (2016); Denemark, Boroumand and Fridrich 2016] proposed algorithms those extracting features of images in independent cannel. In addition to traditional methods based on artificial features, steganalysis methods based on deep learning have been further developed.…”
Section: Steganalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an illustration, for S-UNIWARD they observed detection accuracies of 57.33% and 80.24% for payloads of 0.1 and 0.4 bpp, whereas the ones of SRM+EC were, respectively, of 59.25% and 79.53%. However, the authors have not applied their approach to JPEG domain steganographic algorithms and they pointed out that in the spatial domain more advanced conventional steganalysis methods, such as [24] or [25], still outperformed their approach.…”
Section: B Cnn-based Steganalysismentioning
confidence: 99%