Numerous possibilities of materials are available for oral rehabilitation. Porcelain esthetic level and the mechanical reliability of metallic frameworks have provided the longer lifespan of these restorations. [1] However, the use of metals and the release of ions frequently cause gingival coloration and allergic and inflammatory reactions. [2] This factors motivating the replacement of metallic alloys by biocompatible materials.Esthetical solutions are increasingly challenging due to both patient demand and new materials and techniques available. To this end, ceramic materials have been developed with optical properties similar to natural teeth, [3,4] besides excellent mechanical properties.Among the ceramic materials used in frameworks, zirconia is notable for its tenacity. [5] For use in dental practice, it is usually stabilized on the tetragonal phase with yttrium addition (Y-TPZ). [4,5] Clinical evidence about the tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline stabilized by Y-TZP performance challenge the high frequency of coating ceramics chipping in comparison to the metalloceramic system. [6,7] Possible causes are related to adhesion ceramic materials to zirconia surface, thermal and mechanical compatibility, coating ceramics thickness, technical control of manufacture, among others. [6][7][8] The clinical consequence of a fracture in coating porcelain depends on its length and location. [9] When associating metalloceramics to zirconia ceramics, both of them need thermal and mechanical compatibility. However,