Abstract:This paper tackles the issue of the detection of user's verbal expressions of likes and dislikes in a human-agent interaction. We present a system grounded on the theoretical framework provided by (Martin and White, 2005) that integrates the interaction context by jointly processing agent's and user's utterances. It is designed as a rule-based and bottom-up process based on a symbolic representation of the structure of the sentence. This article also describes the annotation campaign-carried out through Amazon… Show more
“…The analysis (see Fig. 2 ) consists in the process described in [8] . 30 sessions of the corpus have been used for the development set.…”
Section: Level 1a: Detecting the User's Likes And Dislikes Within Adjmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first version of our system [8] was designed for processing jointly, both agent and user's speech turns belonging to same adjacency pairs. Through the context of an adjacency pair, it was possible to deal with the expressions of like or dislike built in a collaborative way (such as question -answering about the user's preferences, see example below).…”
Section: Sa System Grounded On the Topic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system processes jointly each adjacency pair, which allows us to model the agent's utterances in order to help the detection of the user's sentiment-related phenomena. Even though the system presented in [8] shows interesting results, a larger conversational context needs to be considered for improving the efficiency of the system [10] . In [8] , the adjacency pairs were processed without considering neither the progression of the conversation nor the topic structure of the ongoing dialogue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even though the system presented in [8] shows interesting results, a larger conversational context needs to be considered for improving the efficiency of the system [10] . In [8] , the adjacency pairs were processed without considering neither the progression of the conversation nor the topic structure of the ongoing dialogue. A contextualisation of the likes and dislikes with respect to the topic structure of the conversation -defined by the interaction scenario -can be very helpful for the detection system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [8] , we address some of these issues: the selection of the relevant sentiment-related expressions, the likes and the dislikes, and the integration of a first level of dialogic context, the adjacency pairs. We delimit and specify the linguistic phenomenon to detect by focusing on one specific aspect required by ECAs for modelling social relationships: the user's interests that are given by the expressions of the user's likes and dislikes in the verbal content.…”
“…The analysis (see Fig. 2 ) consists in the process described in [8] . 30 sessions of the corpus have been used for the development set.…”
Section: Level 1a: Detecting the User's Likes And Dislikes Within Adjmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first version of our system [8] was designed for processing jointly, both agent and user's speech turns belonging to same adjacency pairs. Through the context of an adjacency pair, it was possible to deal with the expressions of like or dislike built in a collaborative way (such as question -answering about the user's preferences, see example below).…”
Section: Sa System Grounded On the Topic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system processes jointly each adjacency pair, which allows us to model the agent's utterances in order to help the detection of the user's sentiment-related phenomena. Even though the system presented in [8] shows interesting results, a larger conversational context needs to be considered for improving the efficiency of the system [10] . In [8] , the adjacency pairs were processed without considering neither the progression of the conversation nor the topic structure of the ongoing dialogue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even though the system presented in [8] shows interesting results, a larger conversational context needs to be considered for improving the efficiency of the system [10] . In [8] , the adjacency pairs were processed without considering neither the progression of the conversation nor the topic structure of the ongoing dialogue. A contextualisation of the likes and dislikes with respect to the topic structure of the conversation -defined by the interaction scenario -can be very helpful for the detection system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [8] , we address some of these issues: the selection of the relevant sentiment-related expressions, the likes and the dislikes, and the integration of a first level of dialogic context, the adjacency pairs. We delimit and specify the linguistic phenomenon to detect by focusing on one specific aspect required by ECAs for modelling social relationships: the user's interests that are given by the expressions of the user's likes and dislikes in the verbal content.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.