This paper tackles the issue of the detection of user's verbal expressions of likes and dislikes in a human-agent interaction. We present a system grounded on the theoretical framework provided by (Martin and White, 2005) that integrates the interaction context by jointly processing agent's and user's utterances. It is designed as a rule-based and bottom-up process based on a symbolic representation of the structure of the sentence. This article also describes the annotation campaign-carried out through Amazon Mechanical Turk-for the creation of the evaluation dataset. Finally, we present all measures for rating agreement between our system and the human reference and obtain agreement scores that are equal or higher than substantial agreements.
Alignment of communicative behaviour is an important feature of Human-Human interaction that directly affects the collaboration and the social connection of conversational partners. With the aim of improving virtual agent communicative capabilities, and in particular its strategies related to (lexical) verbal alignment, this article focuses on the alignment of linguistic productions of dialogue participants in task-oriented dialogues. We propose a new framework to quantify both the lexical alignment and the self-repetition behaviours of dialogue participants from dyadic dialogue transcripts. It involves easily computable measures based on repetition of lexical patterns automatically extracted via a sequential pattern mining approach. These measures allow the characterisation of the nature of these processes by addressing various informative aspects such as their variety, complexity, and strength. This framework is implemented in the freely available and open-source software dialign. Using these measures, we present a contrastive study between Human-Human and Human-Agent dialogues on various corpora that exposes major differences in the lexical alignment and self-repetition behaviours. Eventually, we address the challenge of integrating lexical alignment capabilities in artificial agents. To this end, we describe guidelines and we discuss the integration of the proposed framework in a real-time dialogue system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.