2022
DOI: 10.1002/stvr.1804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving test automation maturity: A multivocal literature review

Abstract: Mature test automation is key for achieving software quality at speed. In this paper, we present a multivocal literature review with the objective to survey and synthesize the guidelines given in the literature for improving test automation maturity. We selected and reviewed 81 primary studies, consisting of 26 academic literature and 55 grey literature sources. From primary studies, we extracted 26 test automation best practices (e.g., Define an effective test automation strategy, Set up good test environment… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided an interesting field of further work to contrast the results from this study with quality models like ISO25010 (further described in Section 8.2). Such a study could also compare the results from this study with other publications (not included in the literature review), for example, Wang et al [38] touch upon desired characteristics for a test environment and present approaches to set up and improve test environments.…”
Section: Analysis and Cross‐company Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provided an interesting field of further work to contrast the results from this study with quality models like ISO25010 (further described in Section 8.2). Such a study could also compare the results from this study with other publications (not included in the literature review), for example, Wang et al [38] touch upon desired characteristics for a test environment and present approaches to set up and improve test environments.…”
Section: Analysis and Cross‐company Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%