2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the accuracy of the uniaxial bias extension test on engineering fabrics using a simple wrinkle mitigation technique

Abstract: In response to a previous investigation on the influence of specimen pre-shear and wrinkling on the accuracy of uniaxial bias extension test results [1], numerical and experimental investigations have been conducted, aimed at evaluating the use of transparent anti-wrinkle plates to mitigate errors due to wrinkling of engineering fabrics. Predictions of the numerical investigation suggest that the anti-wrinkle plates significantly improve the accuracy of kinematic measurements while introducing only a very mino… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wrinkles are often observed during material characterisation tests, such as the bias extension or picture frame shear tests [13][14][15] for determining the in-plane shear resistance of fabrics. Whilst this deformation is useful for determining the "shear locking angle" to quantify the severity of yarn compaction, the onset of wrinkling can produce inaccuracies in the measured shear angle during the test [16,17]. Shear induced wrinkling can be delayed or prevented in picture frame shear testing due to small tensile forces generated along the fibres by the clamps [18], whereas bias extension testing is quite sensitive to shear induced fabric buckling as the vertical specimen edges are unconstrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wrinkles are often observed during material characterisation tests, such as the bias extension or picture frame shear tests [13][14][15] for determining the in-plane shear resistance of fabrics. Whilst this deformation is useful for determining the "shear locking angle" to quantify the severity of yarn compaction, the onset of wrinkling can produce inaccuracies in the measured shear angle during the test [16,17]. Shear induced wrinkling can be delayed or prevented in picture frame shear testing due to small tensile forces generated along the fibres by the clamps [18], whereas bias extension testing is quite sensitive to shear induced fabric buckling as the vertical specimen edges are unconstrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper limit of 𝜃 𝑚𝑎𝑥 is set here at 45° which makes the highest shear angle of the entire pattern about 49°, this is a conservative value that should avoid potential manufacturing issues when aiming to form the steered sheet. In [31], the measured wrinkle onset shear angles of both glass and carbon-fibre fabrics were greater than 50°. Note that the practical manufacture method will be discussed in a future investigation, here we simply assume that manufacture is possible.…”
Section: Implementation Of Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…43 Many adjacent buckles could be considered as a wrinkle according to the definitive criterion. 55 Also, another defect can be added, which could irregularly appear in some cases; stitches dislocation: where it is a disturbance in stitches' location from their proper place. 29 This defect was accompanying some severe buckles in the deformed fabric, especially when there was a set of roving bigger in size than other sets, an example shown in Figure 8, and it happened irregularly.…”
Section: Defect Formation Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%