2013
DOI: 10.1118/1.4811238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the calibration of radiochromic films by the use of uncertainties in optical density and dose

Abstract: Methods that take into account all the variability both in dose and in optical density should be used in the calibration process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fields were delivered at 70 cm SSD with film placed between slabs of Solid Water (Gammex Inc., Middleton, WI) perpendicular to the beam axis at depths of 1.5 and 2.0 cm for 6 and 20 MeV electrons, respectively. Irradiated films were scanned on an Epson Expression 10000XL scanner (Seiko Epson Corporation, Suwa, Japan) in transmission mode at 150 dpi and processed using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA), according to the procedure outlined by Garcia and Azorin (9) . Using the red channel from each scan, images were corrected for scanner and film nonuniformities by subtracting a scan of an unirradiated film.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fields were delivered at 70 cm SSD with film placed between slabs of Solid Water (Gammex Inc., Middleton, WI) perpendicular to the beam axis at depths of 1.5 and 2.0 cm for 6 and 20 MeV electrons, respectively. Irradiated films were scanned on an Epson Expression 10000XL scanner (Seiko Epson Corporation, Suwa, Japan) in transmission mode at 150 dpi and processed using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA), according to the procedure outlined by Garcia and Azorin (9) . Using the red channel from each scan, images were corrected for scanner and film nonuniformities by subtracting a scan of an unirradiated film.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…arabiensis mosquitoes were reared as described above, and batches of approximately 1000 pupae that had been quantified volumetrically in netted spoons were irradiated (20–26 h after pupation) in a 60 Co Gamma cell 220 (Nordion, Ottawa, Canada) with a dose of 70 Gy which induces partial sterility (~83%) as described by Helinski et al [27]. A dosimetry system was used to verify the dose received by the batches based on the Gafchromic HD-810 film (International Speciality Products, NJ, USA) [28]. Each group of pupae was then placed in each of 9 (30 × 30 × 30 cm) cages (3 for ivermectin treatment, 3 control cages, and 3 cages with virgin sterile males only) and allowed to emerge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration curves at all energies were determined using both FilmQA Pro, as well as a recently published method which includes the error in reference dose and in measured OD when performing nonlinear least square minimization to determine the calibration fit parameters. 39 The effective variance method solved by direct optimization (EV opt ) was implemented in a MATLAB code provided by the authors and modified to use a rational linear calibration function. This method, as the name suggests, uses an effective variance in the y variable, calculated using the following formula:…”
Section: D Film Calibration and Curve Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If using the polynomial functions with netOD over the extended dose range, the fitted functions were found to oscillate between data points, while the rational linear function was found to fit the data well, with the exception of the region with the greatest curvature in the calibration curve (60-500 cGy), particularly in the red channel, where there was a larger deviation. When performing the curve fitting using the Ramos et al 39 nonlinear least squares minimization method the data was fit in three different ways: using equal weightings (i.e., no error included), including error in only the OD values, and including error in both OD and reference dose. For these fittings, the PVs were converted to OD using Eq.…”
Section: D Film Calibration and Curve Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%