2012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Clinical Evidence of Bone Graft Substitute Technology in Lumbar Spine Surgery

Abstract: Bone graft substitutes have been used routinely for spine fusion for decades, yet clinical evidence establishing comparative data remains sparse. With recent scrutiny paid to the outcomes, complications, and costs associated with osteobiologics, a need to improve available data guiding efficacious use exists. We review the currently available clinical literature, studying the outcomes of various biologics in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion, and establish the need for a multicenter, independent osteobiologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of local bone graft from laminectomy and facetectomy sites during decompression has gained popularity in recent years [14]. Local bone graft alone in PLF can achieve good radiological and clinical outcomes [151617].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of local bone graft from laminectomy and facetectomy sites during decompression has gained popularity in recent years [14]. Local bone graft alone in PLF can achieve good radiological and clinical outcomes [151617].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 While the reporting methods of the publications included from this review varied, these reported fusion rates suggest a benefit from the proper use of bone graft extenders and substitutes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall fusion rate achieved was reported at 75 % for ICBG and 65 % with local bone grafts [12]; however, when only multilevel fusions were performed, the fusion rates for ICBG and local bone were 66 % and 20 %, respectively. Historical data report fusion rates with the use of iliac crest in PLF from 50 to 90 % [10]. In addition, for scoliotic patients the mean correction of the deformity was in the range of published series using iliac crest graft, 57 % ± 14 % for iliac crest graft group [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of 65 to 95 % of successful fusion rates based on plain radiographic imaging was reported [10]. The local available bone chips are of limited volume and insufficient for multilevel fusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%