2012
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812451010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Detection of Fungi in Eosinophilic Mucin

Abstract: This report describes a simple modification of the conventional GMS stain that can significantly improve the visualization of fungi on histology and explains the lack of detection in previous studies. These novel, more sensitive histologic methods reveal the presence of fungi within the eosinophilic mucin in allergic and also nonallergic CRS patients, further questioning a crucial role of an IgE-mediated pathophysiology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, eosinophilic mucinous rhinosinusitis as a distinct entity has been called into questioned by those that feel that sensitive methods to evaluate for fungus have not been applied fully to these patients [20,21,26,29]. Guo et al [34] using conventional Gomori methenamine silver stain (GMS) on eosinophilic mucin observed fungal organisms in only 27 % of specimens; however with trypsin pre-digestion followed by GMS, the yield was increased to 91 % of specimens. In addition, using antibodies targeting chitinase and Alternaria sp.…”
Section: Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, eosinophilic mucinous rhinosinusitis as a distinct entity has been called into questioned by those that feel that sensitive methods to evaluate for fungus have not been applied fully to these patients [20,21,26,29]. Guo et al [34] using conventional Gomori methenamine silver stain (GMS) on eosinophilic mucin observed fungal organisms in only 27 % of specimens; however with trypsin pre-digestion followed by GMS, the yield was increased to 91 % of specimens. In addition, using antibodies targeting chitinase and Alternaria sp.…”
Section: Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, using antibodies targeting chitinase and Alternaria sp. antigens, fungi have been reported in 90-100 % of eosinophilic mucin samples, even those negative for histochemical stains [34].…”
Section: Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In surgical specimens from healthy controls, the panfungal DNA was positive in 10 of 15 cases but all were negative for the Alternaria DNA. Studies have also shown that pre-digestion of tissue slides with trypsin before staining dramatically improves identification of fungi by immunofluorescence as does as PCR-DNA analysis [30,31]. …”
Section: Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Crs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical debridement is also a common treatment in CRS [1,2,53]. Identifying specific fungal organisms in CRS caused by mold requires specific fungal staining methods to identify hyphae in sinus specimens or identification of mold by Q-PCR [30,31,54,55]. Treatment of fungal CRS may require the use of oral antifungals, as well as intranasal sprays with antifungal activity, depending upon the improvement of individual patient condition [56].…”
Section: Antifungal Therapy Directed At the Sinusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. alternata has been previously implicated in cases of CRS in the United States [20] and it is among the most ubiquitous phyloplane fungal species in Toronto [23,24]. The presence of A. alternata conidia in the upper respiratory tract has been demonstrated in microscopic and immunologic studies of allergic mucin derived from CRS subjects [25-27]. In vitro studies have also shown that A. alternata extracts induce the recruitment of eosinophils, induce interferon-y, IL-5 and IL-13 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [20,28]; and regulates the expression of surfactant protein D and LL-37 in fungal sensitized CRS patients [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%