2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trajectories followed by the vehicle to navigate within this type of environment must remain acceptable to the users around the vehicle but also to the driver-passenger inside. Many studies currently investigate the communication between the autonomous vehicle and pedestrians through external human-machine interfaces (Faas et al, 2020 ; Métayer and Coeugnet, 2021 ), but it is also important to ensure that the passenger does not fear a collision risk (e.g., when the vehicle adopts proactive navigation, Kabtoul et al, 2020 ). It is therefore essential to study what will determine the acceptability of the vehicle's trajectory relative to other road users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectories followed by the vehicle to navigate within this type of environment must remain acceptable to the users around the vehicle but also to the driver-passenger inside. Many studies currently investigate the communication between the autonomous vehicle and pedestrians through external human-machine interfaces (Faas et al, 2020 ; Métayer and Coeugnet, 2021 ), but it is also important to ensure that the passenger does not fear a collision risk (e.g., when the vehicle adopts proactive navigation, Kabtoul et al, 2020 ). It is therefore essential to study what will determine the acceptability of the vehicle's trajectory relative to other road users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concerns include false interpretations by VRUs, and the risk posed by other road users not in sync with the host e-HMI. Métayer and Coeugnet ( 29 ), Andersson et al ( 30 ), and Habibovic et al ( 31 ) also reported similar concerns. Additionally, while vehicle kinematics were considered the most reliable cues in the interaction between human-driven vehicles and VRUs, they were among the least important information to be displayed on e-HMIs and were also associated with frequent concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, industries and academics have been continuously attempting to determine how to design and construct a well-developed interface. The present research on automated driving exemplifies this [26][27][28]. Thus, a human-machine interface (HMI) has been designed and developed, in order to deliver convenience in the interactive process [29].…”
Section: Ergonomics and Interactionmentioning
confidence: 96%