2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the functionality of surface-engineered yeast cells by altering the cell wall morphology of the host strain

Abstract: The expression of functional proteins on the cell surface using glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchoring technology is a promising approach for constructing yeast cells with special functions. The functionality of surface-engineered yeast strains strongly depends on the amount of functional proteins displayed on their cell surface. On the other hand, since the yeast cell wall space is finite, heterologous protein carrying capacity of the cell wall is limited. Here, we report the effect of CCW12 and CCW14 k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…aculeatus BGL1 fused with the GCW61 under the control of the SPI1 promoter and the SPI1 secretion signal (Pp-BG-SSG61) showed cell-surface BGL activity of 3399 U/g dry cells. This was approximately 2.7-fold higher than that of the previously recorded highest level in S. cerevisiae (1250 U/g dry cells) in our previous study (Inokuma et al, 2021) measured by the same method. Although no reports have directly compared the performance of S. cerevisiae and P. pastoris as hosts for yeast cell-surface display technology, these results clearly demonstrate the potential of P. pastoris as a host for this technology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…aculeatus BGL1 fused with the GCW61 under the control of the SPI1 promoter and the SPI1 secretion signal (Pp-BG-SSG61) showed cell-surface BGL activity of 3399 U/g dry cells. This was approximately 2.7-fold higher than that of the previously recorded highest level in S. cerevisiae (1250 U/g dry cells) in our previous study (Inokuma et al, 2021) measured by the same method. Although no reports have directly compared the performance of S. cerevisiae and P. pastoris as hosts for yeast cell-surface display technology, these results clearly demonstrate the potential of P. pastoris as a host for this technology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…32 A thicker cell wall was also observed in yeast strains with the cell wall mannoprotein genes CCW12 and CCW14 deleted; 33 mannoprotein reduction in these strains led to increased cell wall flexibility and reduced mechanical strength. 33 Reduction of mannoprotein can also increase cell wall porosity. 34 Although a thicker cell wall was observed concomitantly with reduced mannoprotein, no direct connection was reported between a thicker cell wall and increased cell wall flexibility.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of β-1,3-glucan can cause the release of closely linked mannoproteins from the cell wall . A thicker cell wall was also observed in yeast strains with the cell wall mannoprotein genes CCW12 and CCW14 deleted; mannoprotein reduction in these strains led to increased cell wall flexibility and reduced mechanical strength . Reduction of mannoprotein can also increase cell wall porosity .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one genetic defect can cause pleiotropic changes in the cell wall structure-function relationship ( Matsuoka et al, 2014 ). Inokuma et al (2021) increased the cell wall thickness of S. cerevisiae by performing the knockout of proteins CCW12 and CCW14, which allowed an increased amount of displayed β-glucosidase as compared to the parental strain.…”
Section: Strategies To Improve Yeast Surface Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%