2006
DOI: 10.1177/07419325060270040401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students With Disabilities Through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of computer-assisted comprehension practice using a researcher-developed computer program, Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading (CACSR), with students who had disabilities. Two reading/ language arts teachers and their 34 students with disabilities participated. Students in the intervention group received the CACSR intervention, which consisted of 50-min instructional sessions twice per week over 10 to 12 weeks. The results revealed a statistically significant d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
104
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During extended talk, teachers pose cognitively challenging questions to activate higher order thinking and prompt effective vocabulary growth and reading comprehension (Apthorp, 2006;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Kim et al, 2006). Strategies that are based on these recommendations are cited as collaborative strategic reading (CSR) (Kim et al, 2006); instructional conversations (Goldenberg, 2013), cognitive strategy instruction (Hansfield & Jiménez, 2009); language experience approach (LEA) (Dorr, 2006); and direct and extended vocabulary instruction (Coyne et al, 2010). Such practices encourage students to process text and ideas for deeper levels of understanding, which improves comprehension, critical thinking, and overall achievement.…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…During extended talk, teachers pose cognitively challenging questions to activate higher order thinking and prompt effective vocabulary growth and reading comprehension (Apthorp, 2006;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Kim et al, 2006). Strategies that are based on these recommendations are cited as collaborative strategic reading (CSR) (Kim et al, 2006); instructional conversations (Goldenberg, 2013), cognitive strategy instruction (Hansfield & Jiménez, 2009); language experience approach (LEA) (Dorr, 2006); and direct and extended vocabulary instruction (Coyne et al, 2010). Such practices encourage students to process text and ideas for deeper levels of understanding, which improves comprehension, critical thinking, and overall achievement.…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended practices include collaborative reading 9 strategies (CSR) (Kim et al, 2006), literature circles (Medina, 2010), reciprocal teaching (Hansfield & Jiménez, 2009), peer-tutoring, book discussions, learning together through inquiry and questioning (Hansen-Thomas & Cavagnetto, 2010;Ivey & Broaddus, 2007;Mahdavi & Tensfeldt, 2013), and peer assisted learning strategies (PALS) (Mahdavi & Tensfeldt, 2013). Dialogue that centers on texts, ideas, and issues provides classroom opportunities for learners to experience others' thoughts, which allows for deliberation and critical reflection about their own and others' perspectives.…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One particular approach to teaching reading -Collaborative Strategic Readingis based on the principles of reciprocal teaching (Palincsar & Brown, 1984), which interactive dialogue (Kim et al, 2006 collaboration at all stages of the reading activity. Instruction of this kind has been associated with positive results in enhancing reading comprehension and avoiding text comprehension failure (Bremer, Vaughn, Clapper, & Kim, 2002;, 1999, 2000Klingner, Vaughn, & Schumm, 1998;Vaughn, Klingner, & Bryant, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%