Improving the representation of adaptation in climate change impact models

Abstract

Climate change adaptation is a complex human process, framed by uncertainties and constraints, which is difficult to capture in existing assessment models. Attempts to improve model representations are hampered by a shortage of systematic descriptions of adaptation processes and their relevance to models. This paper reviews the scientific literature to investigate conceptualisations and models of climate change adaptation, and the ways in which representation of adaptation in models can be improved. The review shows that real-world adaptive responses can be differentiated along a number of dimensions including intent or purpose, timescale, spatial scale, beneficiaries and providers, type of action, and sector. However, models of climate change consequences for land use and water management currently provide poor coverage of these dimensions, instead modelling adaptation in an artificial and subjective manner. While different modelling approaches do capture distinct aspects of the adaptive process, they have done so in relative isolation, without producing improved unified representations. Furthermore, adaptation is often assumed to be objective, effective and consistent through time, with only a minority of models taking account of the human decisions underpinning the choice of adaptation measures (14%), the triggers that motivate actions (38%) or the time-lags and constraints that may limit their uptake and effectiveness (14%). No models included adaptation to take advantage of beneficial opportunities of climate change. Based on these insights, transferable recommendations are made on directions for future model development that may enhance realism within models, while also advancing our understanding of the processes and effectiveness of adaptation to a changing climate.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10113-018-1328-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Adaptations in irrigated agriculture in the Mediterranean region: an overview and spatial analysis of implemented strategies

“…However, using a combination of a systematic review and spatial analysis has not yet been applied to study adaptation, or the spatial context of decision-making in general on such a large scale. Mapping and modeling adaptation is difficult, due to the complex nature of decision-making behind adaptation (Holman et al 2019 ). Nevertheless, our models show a good fit, thereby demonstrating that this method can also be used to identify spatial variability and context in which adaptations are implemented.…”

Integrating human behavior dynamics into drought risk assessment—A sociohydrologic, agent‐based approach

“…While a sociohydrologic approach has been applied in risk science (Di Baldassarre, Kooy, Kemerink, & Brandimarte, ; Di Baldassarre et al, ; Di Baldassarre et al, ; Gober & Wheater, ; Khan et al, ; Kuil, Carr, Viglione, Prskawetz, & Bloschl, ; Van Emmerik et al, ), most attempts have focused on the actions of a rational, single‐actor group at the expense of interaction between, and bounded rational behavior of, individuals, collective water users, and institutions (Bouziotas & Ertsen, ; Mostert, ; Noël & Cai, ). This limitation highlights an opportunity to better study and understand how the emergence of heterogeneous adaptation across space and time can influence risk (Holman, Brown, Carter, Harrison, & Rounsevell, ). This is particularly relevant for simulating counter‐intuitive feedbacks to water consumption influenced by changing risk perceptions (Box 2).…”

“…Besides, imitation and social learning are subject to network externalities and influence people's adaptation intention and choice of specific measures (Barthel et al, ; Kiesling et al, 2012). Often, initial decisions, made by a few, can grow into large collective actions, either through government incentive or social networks (Ertsen, Murphy, Purdue, & Zhu, ; Holman et al, ). In this way, the capacity to act on information at the individual level is a significant predictor of adaptation intent (CRED & UNISDR, ; Grothmann & Patt, ; Haer, Botzen, & Aerts, ).…”

A Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the National Economic Impacts of Regulatory Drought Management on Irrigated Agriculture

“…In addition, it has been found that soil suitability restrictions and water resource availability for new abstraction licenses under climate change can constrain future opportunities for expansion and/or migration of irrigated cropping (Daccache et al, ). While future autonomous adaptation by farmers is inevitable, modeling tools do not currently enable confident projections of spatial change for specific high‐value (and sometime niche) crops (Holman et al, ).…”