Improving the representativeness of influenza viruses shared within the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System

Abstract

BackgroundSharing influenza viruses within the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System is crucial for monitoring evolution of influenza viruses.ObjectivesAnalysis of timeliness and geographic representativeness of viruses shared by National Influenza Centres (NICs) in the WHO European Region with the London WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza for the Northern Hemisphere's 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 influenza seasons.Materials and methodsData from NICs on influenza‐positive specimens shared with WHO CC London for the above‐mentioned influenza seasons were analyzed for timeliness of sharing with respect to the February deadline (31 January) for inclusion in the WHO consultations on the composition of influenza virus vaccines for the Northern Hemisphere and geographic representativeness.ResultsThe 2010–2011 and 2011–2012 seasons were different in terms of the seasonal pattern, the timing of the epidemic, and the dominant virus. Consistent patterns of virus sharing across the seasons were observed. Approximately half the viruses collected before the deadline were not shared within the deadline; the average delay between date of specimen collection and shipment receipt was 3 and 1·5 months for the first and second season, respectively.ConclusionA baseline was provided for future work on enhancement of specimen sharing in the WHO European Region and improving the vaccine virus selection process. Greater insight into virus selection criteria applied by countries and the causes of delays in shipment are needed to understand the representativeness of viruses shared and to assess the importance of this for vaccine strain selection.

Insights into the antigenic advancement of influenza A(H3N2) viruses, 2011–2018

“…In recent years, substantial efforts have been made to strengthen U.S. national and global surveillance. The number of laboratories participating in surveillance has increased, and the timeliness and representativeness of specimens submitted for virological characterization has improved, providing a positive impact on the overall quality of data 16,17 . The broad implementation of next generation sequencing (NGS) methods for characterization of virus genomes in clinical specimens and isolates propagated in vitro , and the use of advanced methods for genetic analyses are examples of these recent efforts.…”

Mechanisms of replacement of circulating viruses by seasonal and pandemic influenza A viruses

“…Since replacement by a new antigenic variant is likely to take place in the tropical region, it is necessary to strengthen surveillance there in order to detect antigenic variants in a timely manner. 54 Such an effort could avoid a mismatch between circulating and vaccine strains. 55,56 Also, knowing whether a pandemic virus has replaced a former (seasonal) virus would be useful when considering which subtypes of the virus should be included in the vaccine.…”

Predictive Modeling of Influenza Shows the Promise of Applied Evolutionary Biology

“…Yet in practice, it has been difficult to balance the collection of surveillance data from across the globe. There are strong geographical biases in reported data [78]; Europe and North America are sampled more intensely than other regions (Fig. 2).…”